|
Canada
(Province or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
| |
1000
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number, if applicable) |
| |
Not applicable
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No., if applicable) |
|
|
Copies to:
|
| ||||||
|
Ana Cabral-Gardner
Co-Chief Executive Officer Sigma Lithium Corporation 885 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8 Tel: +55 11-2985-0089 |
| |
Christopher J. Cummings
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Tel: 212-373-3000 |
| |
Chad Accursi
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP Suite 2100, Scotia Plaza, 40 King Street West Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 Tel: 416-869-5300 |
|
A.
|
☒
|
upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Rule 467(a) (if in connection with an offering being made contemporaneously in the United States and Canada). |
B.
|
☐
|
at some future date (check the appropriate box below): |
1.
|
☐
|
pursuant to Rule 467(b) on ( ) at ( ) (designate a time not sooner than 7 calendar days after filing). |
2.
|
☐
|
pursuant to Rule 467(b) on ( ) at ( ) (designate a time 7 calendar days or sooner after filing) because the securities regulatory authority in the review jurisdiction has issued a receipt or notification of clearance on ( ). |
3.
|
☐
|
pursuant to Rule 467(b) as soon as practicable after notification of the Commission by the Registrant or the Canadian securities regulatory authority of the review jurisdiction that a receipt or notification of clearance has been issued with respect hereto. |
4.
|
☐
|
after the filing of the next amendment to this Form (if preliminary material is being filed). |
|
New Issue and/or Secondary Offering
|
| |
December 1, 2021
|
|
| | | | | 1 | | | |
| | | | | 1 | | | |
| | | | | 5 | | | |
| | | | | 5 | | | |
| | | | | 6 | | | |
| | | | | 6 | | | |
| | | | | 8 | | | |
| | | | | 8 | | | |
| | | | | 9 | | | |
| | | | | 11 | | | |
| | | | | 12 | | | |
| | | | | 12 | | | |
| | | | | 13 | | | |
| | | | | 13 | | | |
| | | | | 14 | | | |
| | | | | 15 | | | |
| | | | | 16 | | | |
| | | | | 17 | | | |
| | | | | 17 | | | |
| | | | | 17 | | | |
| | | | | 17 | | | |
| | | | | 17 | | | |
| | | | | 18 | | | |
| | | | | 19 | | | |
| | | | | 19 | | | |
| | | | | 19 | | | |
| | | | | 20 | | | |
| | | | | 21 | | |
| | |
United States Dollars into Canadian Dollars
and Brazilian Reais |
| |||
| | |
2020
|
| |
2019
|
|
High
|
| |
Cdn$1.45/R$5.93
|
| |
Cdn$1.36/R$4.27
|
|
Low
|
| |
Cdn$1.27/R$4.02
|
| |
Cdn$1.30/R$3.64
|
|
Rate at end of period
|
| |
Cdn$1.27/R$5.19
|
| |
Cdn$1.30/R$4.02
|
|
Average rate for period
|
| |
Cdn$1.34/R$5.15
|
| |
Cdn$1.33/R$3.94
|
|
Exhibit
Number |
| |
Description
|
|
4.1**
|
| | | |
4.2
|
| | | |
4.3
|
| | | |
4.4
|
| | | |
4.5
|
| | | |
4.6
|
| | | |
4.7
|
| | | |
5.1**
|
| | Consent of KPMG LLP | |
5.2*
|
| | Consent of Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP. | |
5.3*
|
| | Consent of Guilherme Gomides Ferreira, B.Sc., M.Eng. | |
5.4*
|
| | Consent of Marc-Antoine Laporte, P.Geo. | |
5.5*
|
| | Consent of Jacques Parent, P.Eng., Ph.D. | |
5.6*
|
| | Consent of Jarrett Quinn, P.Eng. | |
5.7*
|
| | Consent of Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez, B.Sc., M.Eng. | |
5.8**
|
| | Consent of Homero Delboni Jr. B.E., M.Eng.Sc., Ph.D. | |
5.9*
|
| | Consent of Jacqueline Wang, P.Eng. | |
5.10**
|
| | Consent of Stephane Normandin, P. Eng. | |
5.11**
|
| | Consent of Wes Roberts, P.Eng. | |
6.1*
|
| | Powers of Attorney (included on page III-4 of the initial Registration Statement). | |
7.1**
|
| | |
|
Signature
|
| |
Capacity
|
| |
Date
|
|
|
*
Calvyn Gardner
|
| |
Co-Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
| |
December 2, 2021
|
|
|
*
Felipe Peres
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| |
December 2, 2021
|
|
|
/s/ Ana Cristina Cabral Gardner
Ana Cristina Cabral Gardner
|
| |
Co-Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
| |
December 2, 2021
|
|
|
*
Gary Litwack
|
| |
Director
|
| |
December 2, 2021
|
|
|
*
Frederico Marques
|
| |
Director
|
| |
December 2, 2021
|
|
|
*
Marcelo Paiva
|
| |
Director
|
| |
December 2, 2021
|
|
Exhibit 4.1
Annual Information Form (Amended and Restated)
For the year ended December 31, 2020
December 1, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTERPRETATION | 6 |
Definitions | 6 |
CIM Definition Standards | 6 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION | 7 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES | 11 |
OTHER INFORMATION | 11 |
Currency | 11 |
Third Party Information | 11 |
Non-GAAP Measures | 12 |
Date of Information | 12 |
STRUCTURE OF THE COMPANY | 13 |
Name, Address and Incorporation | 13 |
Intercorporate Relationships | 13 |
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS | 14 |
Overview | 14 |
Three Year History | 14 |
Operations | 14 |
Environmental Social and Governance | 16 |
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS | 20 |
Overview | 20 |
Lithium Properties | 20 |
Royalties | 27 |
Life Cycle Analysis and Net Zero Strategy | 27 |
Environmental Licensing and Permitting | 28 |
Surface Rights and Other Permitting | 29 |
Specialized Skills and Knowledge | 29 |
Mineral Price and Economic Cycles | 29 |
Economic Dependence | 29 |
Bankruptcy and Similar Procedures | 29 |
Reorganizations | 29 |
Foreign Operations | 29 |
Employees | 30 |
Environmental Protection | 30 |
Social and Environmental Policies | 30 |
SUMMARY OF UPDATED FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT | 30 |
Property Description and Location | 30 |
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography | 31 |
History | 31 |
Geological Setting and Mineralization | 31 |
Exploration | 32 |
Drilling | 32 |
Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security | 33 |
Data Verification | 35 |
Mineral processing and Metallurgical Testing | 35 |
First Mine | 35 |
Second Mine | 36 |
Mineral resource estimates | 36 |
Mineral Reserve Estimates | 40 |
Mining methods | 41 |
First Mine | 41 |
Second Mine | 41 |
Recovery methods | 42 |
Processing Plant Description | 42 |
Design Criteria and Utilities Requirements | 42 |
Project Infrastructure | 43 |
Buildings, Roads, Fuel Storage, Power Supply and Water Supply | 43 |
Waste Rock and Tailings Disposal and Stockpiles | 43 |
Control Systems and Communication | 44 |
Market Studies and Contracts | 44 |
Demand and Consumption | 44 |
Supply | 44 |
Contracts | 44 |
Price Forecast | 45 |
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact | 45 |
Applicable Legal Requirements for Project Environmental Permitting | 45 |
Current Project Environmental Permitting Status | 45 |
Authorizations | 46 |
Land Access | 46 |
Social License Considerations | 46 |
Rehabilitation, Closure Planning and Post-Closure Monitoring | 47 |
Second Mine Environmental Work to Date | 47 |
Capital and Operating Costs | 47 |
Capital Costs First Mine | 47 |
Operating Costs First Mine | 48 |
Plant CAPEX and OPEX Second Mine | 49 |
Mining Capital Costs Second Mine | 49 |
Mining Operating Costs Second Mine | 49 |
Economic Analysis | 50 |
Production Phase 1 | 50 |
Production Phase 2 | 53 |
Interpretation and Conclusions | 56 |
Risk Assessment | 56 |
Opportunities | 56 |
Recommendations | 57 |
Geology and Resources | 57 |
First Mine Recommendations | 57 |
Second Mine Project Recommendations | 57 |
Competitive Conditions and Anticipated Trends | 58 |
Emerging Market Disclosure | 61 |
RISK FACTORS | 63 |
Risk Factors | 63 |
Risks Related to Resource Development | 64 |
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE | 78 |
Common Shares | 78 |
DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS | 78 |
MARKET FOR SECURITIES | 79 |
Market | 79 |
Trading Price and Volume | 79 |
PRIOR SALES | 80 |
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS | 80 |
Name and Occupation | 80 |
Shareholdings of Directors and Officers | 82 |
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions | 82 |
Committees of the Board | 83 |
Conflicts of Interest | 83 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION | 84 |
Audit Committee Charter | 84 |
Composition of the Audit Committee | 84 |
Relevant Education and Experience | 84 |
Audit Committee Oversight | 85 |
Reliance on Certain Exemptions | 85 |
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures | 85 |
Audit Fees | 86 |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS | 85 |
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS | 85 |
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR | 85 |
MATERIAL CONTRACTS | 85 |
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS | 86 |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | 86 |
SCHEDULE “A” Audit Committee Charter | 87 |
EXHIBIT “A” TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER | 92 |
SCHEDULE “B” DEFINITIONS | 94 |
INTERPRETATION
Definitions
For a description of defined terms and other reference information used in this Annual Information Form (this “AIF”), please refer to Schedule “B”.
CIM Definition Standards
The disclosure included in this AIF uses mineral resources and mineral reserves classification terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada. All mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are made in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards and NI 43-101, which is a set of rules developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects and operations. The following definitions are reproduced from the CIM Definition Standards:
A mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into inferred, indicated and measured categories, which are defined as follows:
· | An inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An inferred mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration. |
· | An indicated mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of modifying factors (as defined below) in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An indicated mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a measured mineral resource and may only be converted to a probable mineral reserve. |
· | A measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of modifying factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. A measured mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred mineral resource. It may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve. |
“Modifying factors” are considerations used to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 6 |
A mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured and/or indicated mineral resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at pre-feasibility or feasibility level as appropriate that include application of modifying factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified. Mineral reserves are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into probable and proven categories, which are defined as follows:
· | A probable mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of an indicated, and in some circumstances, a measured mineral resource. The confidence in the modifying factors applying to a probable mineral reserve is lower than that applying to a proven mineral reserve. |
· | A proven mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource. A proven mineral reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the modifying factors. |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain information and statements in this AIF may constitute “forward looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and “forward looking statements” within the meaning of U.S. securities legislation (collectively, “Forward Looking Information”), which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such Forward Looking Information. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, may be Forward Looking Information, including, but not limited to, mineral resource or mineral reserve estimates (which reflect a prediction of mineralization that would be realized by development). When used in this AIF, such statements generally use words such as “may”, “would”, “could”, “will”, “intend”, “expect”, “believe”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar terminology. These statements reflect management’s current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this AIF. Forward Looking Information involves significant risks and uncertainties, should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and does not necessarily provide accurate indications of whether or not such results will be achieved. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the Forward Looking Information, which is based upon what management believes are reasonable assumptions, and there can be no assurance that actual results will be consistent with the Forward Looking Information.
In particular (but without limitation), this AIF contains Forward Looking Information with respect to the following matters: statements regarding anticipated decision making with respect to the Project; capital expenditure programs; estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves; development of mineral resources and mineral reserves; government regulation of mining operations and treatment under governmental and taxation regimes; the future price of commodities, including lithium; the realization of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, including whether mineral resources will ever be developed into mineral reserves; the timing and amount of future production; currency exchange and interest rates; expected outcome and timing of environmental surveys and permit applications and other environmental matters; the Company’s ability to raise capital and obtain project financing; expected expenditures to be made by the Company on its properties; successful operations and the timing, cost, quantity, capacity and quality of production; capital costs, operating costs and sustaining capital requirements, including the cost of construction of the processing plant for the Project; and competitive conditions and anticipated trends post-COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing uncertainties and effects in respect of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 7 |
Forward Looking Information does not take into account the effect of transactions or other items announced or occurring after the statements are made. Forward Looking Information is based upon a number of expectations and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those disclosed in or implied by such Forward Looking Information. With respect to the Forward Looking Information, the Company has made assumptions regarding, among other things:
· | General economic and political conditions |
· | Stable and supportive legislative, regulatory and community environment in the jurisdictions where the Company operates |
· | Stability and inflation of the Brazilian Real, including any foreign exchange or capital controls which may be enacted in respect thereof, and the effect of current or any additional regulations on the Company’s operations |
· | Anticipated trends and effects in respect of the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic |
· | Demand for lithium, including that such demand is supported by growth in the electric vehicle (“EV”) market |
· | Estimates of, and changes to, the market prices for lithium |
· | The impact of increasing competition in the lithium business and the Company’s competitive position in the industry |
· | The Company’s market position and future financial and operating performance |
· | The Company’s estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including whether mineral resources will ever be developed into mineral reserves |
· | Anticipated timing and results of exploration, development and construction activities |
· | Reliability of technical data |
· | The Company’s ability to develop and achieve production at the Project |
· | The Company’s ability to obtain financing on satisfactory terms to develop the Project |
· | The Company’s ability to obtain and maintain mining, exploration, environmental and other permits, authorizations and approvals for the Project |
· | The timing and possible outcome of regulatory and permitting matters for the Project |
· | The exploration, development, construction and operational costs for the Project |
· | The accuracy of budget, construction and operations estimates for the Project |
· | Successful negotiation of definitive commercial agreements, including off-take agreements for the Project |
· | The Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner. |
Although management believes that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such Forward Looking Information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these assumptions and expectations will prove to be correct. Since Forward Looking Information inherently involves risks and uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such information.
The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any Forward Looking Information as a result of various known and unknown risk factors, including (but not limited to) the risk factors referred to under the heading “Risk Factors” in this AIF. Such risks relate to, but are not limited to, the following:
· | The Company may not develop the Project into a commercial mining operation |
· | There can be no assurance that market prices for lithium will remain at current levels or that such prices will improve |
· | The market for electric vehicles (“EVs”) and other large format batteries currently has limited market share and no assurances can be given for the rate at which this market will develop, if at all, which could affect the success of the Company and its ability to develop lithium operations |
· | Changes in technology or other developments could result in preferences for substitute products |
· | New production of lithium hydroxide or lithium carbonate from current or new competitors in the lithium markets could adversely affect prices |
· | The Project is at development stage and the Company’s ability to succeed in progressing through development to commercial operations will depend on a number of factors, some of which may be outside its control |
· | The Company’s financial condition, operations and results of any future operations are subject to political, economic, social, regulatory and geographic risks of doing business in Brazil |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 8 |
· | Violations of anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and economic sanctions laws and regulations could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, reputation, results of any future operations and financial condition |
· | The Company is subject to regulatory frameworks applicable to the Brazilian mining industry which could be subject to further change, as well as government approval and permitting requirements, which may result in limitations on the Company’s business and activities |
· | The Company’s operations are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations and expose the Company to environmental compliance risks, which may result in significant costs and have the potential to reduce the profitability of operations |
· | Physical climate change events and the trend toward more stringent regulations aimed at reducing the effects of climate change could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and future operations |
· | As the Company does not have any experience in the construction and operation of a mine, processing plants and related infrastructure, it is more difficult to evaluate the Company’s prospects, and the Company’s future success is more uncertain than if it had a more proven history of developing a mine |
· | The Company’s future production estimates are based on existing mine plans and other assumptions which change from time to time. No assurance can be given that such estimates will be achieved |
· | The Company may experience unexpected costs and cost overruns, problems and delays during construction, development, mine start-up and operations for reasons outside of the Company’s control, which have the potential to materially affect its ability to fully fund required expenditures and/or production or, alternatively, may require the Company to consider less attractive financing solutions |
· | The Company’s capital and operating cost estimates may vary from actual costs and revenues for reasons outside of the Company’s control |
· | The Company’s operations are subject to the high degree of risk normally incidental to the exploration for, and the development and operation of, mineral properties |
· | Insurance may not be available to insure against all such risks, or the costs of such insurance may be uneconomic. Losses from uninsured and underinsured losses have the potential to materially affect the Company’s financial position and prospects |
· | The Company is subject to risks associated with securing title and property interests |
· | The Company is subject to strong competition in Brazil and in the global mining industry |
· | The Company may become subject to government orders, investigations, inquiries or other proceedings (including civil claims) relating to health and safety matters, which could result in consequences material to its business and operations |
· | The Company’s mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are estimates only and no assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that identified mineral resources or mineral reserves will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit |
· | The Company’s operations and the development of its projects may be adversely affected if it is unable to maintain positive community relations |
· | The Company is exposed to risks associated with doing business with counterparties, which may impact the Company’s operations and financial condition |
· | Any limitation on the transfer of cash or other assets between the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries, or among such entities, could restrict the Company’s ability to fund its operations efficiently |
· | The Company is subject to risks associated with its reliance on consultants and others for mineral exploration and exploitation expertise |
· | The current COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operations, financial condition and stock price |
· | If the Company is unable to ultimately generate sufficient revenues to become profitable and have positive cash flows, it could have a material adverse effect on its prospects, business, financial condition, results of operations or overall viability as an operating business |
· | The Company is subject to liquidity risk and therefore may have to include a “going concern” note in its financial statements |
· | The Company may not be able to obtain sufficient financing in the future on acceptable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In order to obtain additional financing, the Company may conduct additional (and possibly dilutive) equity offerings or debt issuances in the future |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 9 |
· | The Company may be unable to achieve cash flow from operating activities sufficient to permit it to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Company’s indebtedness, or maintain its debt covenants |
· | The Company has not declared or paid dividends in the past and may not declare or pay dividends in the future |
· | The Company will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company both in Canada listed on the TSXV and in the United States listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”), and its management will be required to devote further substantial time to United States public company compliance efforts |
· | If the Company does not maintain adequate and appropriate internal controls over financial reporting as outlined in accordance with NI 52-109 or the Rules and Regulations of the SEC, the Company will have to report a material weakness and disclose that the Company has not maintained appropriate internal controls over financial reporting |
· | As a foreign private issuer, the Company is subject to different U.S. securities laws and rules than a domestic U.S. issuer, which may limit the information publicly available to its shareholders |
· | Failure to retain key officers, consultants and employees or to attract and, if attracted, retain additional key individuals with necessary skills could have a materially adverse impact upon the Company’s success |
· | The Company is subject to currency fluctuation risks |
· | From time to time, the Company may become involved in litigation, which may have a material adverse effect on its business financial condition and prospects |
· | Certain directors and officers of the Company are, or may become, associated with other natural resource companies which may give rise to conflicts of interest |
· | The market price for the Company’s shares may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors beyond its control, and the Company may be subject to securities litigation as a result |
· | If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about the Company’s business, or if they downgrade the Common Shares, the price of the Common Shares could decline |
· | The Company will have broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds from offerings of its securities |
· | There is no guarantee that the Common Shares will earn any positive return in the short term or long term |
· | The Company has a major shareholder which owns 55.5% of the outstanding Common Shares and, as such, for as long as such shareholder directly or indirectly maintains a significant interest in the Company, it may be in a position to affect the Company’s governance, operations and the market price of the Common Shares |
· | As the Company is a Canadian corporation but most of its directors and officers are not citizens or residents of Canada or the U.S., it may be difficult or impossible for an investor to enforce judgements against the Company and its directors and officers outside of Canada and the U.S. which may have been obtained in Canadian or U.S. courts or initiate court action outside Canada or the U.S. against the Company and its directors and officers in respect of an alleged breach of securities laws or otherwise. Similarly, it may be difficult for U.S. shareholders to effect service on the Company to realize on judgments obtained in the United States |
· | The Company is governed by the corporate and securities laws of the Province of British Columbia and of Canada, which in some cases have a different effect on shareholders than U.S. corporate laws and U.S. securities laws |
· | The Company is subject to risks associated with its information technology systems and cyber-security |
· | The Company may be a Passive Foreign Investment Company, which may result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders of Common Shares |
Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of assumptions and risks is not exhaustive. The Forward Looking Information contained in this AIF is expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. All Forward Looking Information in this AIF speaks as of the date of this AIF. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any Forward Looking Information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities law. Additional information about these assumptions, risks and uncertainties is contained in the Company’s filings with securities regulators, including the Company’s most recent annual and interim MD&A, which are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 10 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES
Technical disclosure regarding the Company’s properties included in this AIF, and in the documents incorporated herein by reference has not been prepared in accordance with the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Without limiting the foregoing, such technical disclosure uses terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada and estimates are made in accordance with NI 43-101. Unless otherwise indicated, all mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates contained in the technical disclosure have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards.
Under the SEC rules regarding disclosure of technical information, the definitions of “proven mineral reserves” and “probable mineral reserves” are substantially similar to the corresponding CIM Definition Standards, and the SEC recognizes “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” which are also substantially similar to the corresponding CIM Definition Standards. However, there are still differences in the definitions and standards under the SEC rules and the CIM Definition Standards. Therefore, the Company’s mineral resources and reserves as determined in accordance with NI 43-101 may be significantly different than if they had been determined in accordance with the SEC rules.
OTHER INFORMATION
Currency
This AIF contains references to United States dollars, Canadian dollars and Brazilian Reais. All dollar amounts referenced, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in Canadian dollars “Cdn$”. United States dollars are referred to as “US$”. Brazilian Reais are referred to as “R$”.
The following table sets forth the high and low, average and period-end exchange rates for one US dollar expressed in Canadian dollars and Brazilian Reais for each period indicated, based upon the daily exchange rates provided by the Bank of Canada and FactSet:
United States Dollars into Canadian Dollars and Brazilian Reais | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
High | Cdn$1.45/R$5.93 | Cdn$1.36/R$4.27 | ||||||
Low | Cdn$1.27/R$4.02 | Cdn$1.30/R$3.64 | ||||||
Rate at end of period | Cdn$1.27/R$5.19 | Cdn$1.30/R$4.02 | ||||||
Average rate for period | Cdn$1.34/R$5.15 | Cdn$1.33/R$3.94 |
On November 30, 2021, the rate for Canadian dollars (as quoted by the Bank of Canada) and Brazilian Reais (as quoted by FactSet) in terms of the United States dollar was US$1.00 = Cdn$1.2828/R$5.6486.
Third Party Information
This AIF includes market, industry and economic data and projections obtained from various publicly available sources and other sources believed by the Company to be true. Although the Company believes these to be reliable, it has not independently verified the information from third party sources, or analyzed or verified the underlying reports relied upon or referred to by the third parties, or ascertained the underlying economic and other assumptions relied upon by the third parties. The Company believes that the market, industry and economic data and projections are accurate and that the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, but there can be no assurance as to their accuracy or completeness. The accuracy and completeness of the market, industry and economic data and projections in this AIF are not guaranteed and the Company does not make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 11 |
Non-GAAP Measures
This AIF and the Updated Feasibility Study Report incorporated by reference herein contains certain non-GAAP measures. The non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning within IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These measures provide information that is customary in the mining industry and that is useful in evaluating the Project. This data should not be considered as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Qualified Person
Mr. Wes Roberts, P.Eng., a member of the technical committee of the Company, is the “qualified person” under NI 43-101 who reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this AIF and the documents incorporated by reference herein.
Date of Information
Except as otherwise indicated, all information disclosed in this AIF is as of December 1, 2021.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 12 |
STRUCTURE OF THE COMPANY
Name, Address and Incorporation
Sigma Lithium Corporation (the “Company” or “Sigma”) is domiciled in Canada and was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on June 8, 2011 originally under the name Margaux Red Capital Inc. The current business of Sigma was acquired through a reverse take-over transaction on April 30, 2018 pursuant to which the Company acquired Sigma Lithium Resources Inc (“Sigma Holdings”) which held (and continues to hold) the Grota do Cirilo Project, located in the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil (the ”Project”) through a Brazilian wholly-owned subsidiary, Sigma Mineração S.A. (“Sigma Brazil”). On completion of the reverse take-over transaction, the Company implemented a share consolidation. On July 5, 2021, the Company changed its name from “Sigma Lithium Resources Corporation” to “Sigma Lithium Corporation”.
The head office of the Company is at Suite 2200, HSBC Building, 885 West Georgia St. Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8 Canada and its web site is www.sigmalithium.ca.
Intercorporate Relationships
The corporate structure of the Company, its subsidiaries, the jurisdiction of incorporation of such corporations and the percentage of equity ownership are set out in the following chart:
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 13 |
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
Overview
Sigma is a Canadian-based mineral processing and development company, focused on advancing, with an environmental sustainability directed strategy, one of the largest hardrock lithium projects in the Americas - its wholly-owned Grota do Cirilo Project in Brazil, with the goal of participating in the rapidly expanding lithium-ion battery supply chain for EVs. For further information on the business of the Company, please refer to “Description of the Business”.
Three Year History
The following is a summary of the key developments that have generally influenced the development of the Company’s business and projects over the last three years.
Operations
The Company continues to advance toward initiating commercial production in 2022. On November 9, 2021, the Company announced that it is mobilizing its workforce and equipment on site for construction of the Production Plant. This stage comprises the earthworks necessary for installation of the Production Plant and infrastructure foundations. It is expected that approximately one million cubic meters of soil/subsoils will be moved, employing a workforce of approximately 180 personnel. Completion of this stage is expected within three months.
The Company successfully completed several workstreams involved in the pre-construction of the Project within its schedule and budget parameters. In 2021, the Company reached major milestones towards engineering and construction, despite challenging circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Company is managing three interconnected workstreams aimed to develop the Project as a whole:
· | The completion of detailed engineering and execution and management of construction activities for Production Phase 1 and the Production Plant |
· | The completion of the pre-feasibility study of Production Phase 2, aimed at a potential production expansion |
· | The continued exploration and expansion of the Project’s estimated mineral resources, with the objective of increasing the Project’s mine life and/or a potential Production Phase 3 expansion scenario |
For further information on Production Phase 1, Production Phase 2 and Production Phase 3, please refer to “Description of the Business – Current Status of the Project”.
In relation to the Production Phase 1 workstream, the Company expects Front-End Engineering and Design (“FEED”) to be finalized in the fourth quarter of 2021. The revised capital expenditure (“CAPEX”) estimation is ongoing and final CAPEX with a Project Execution Plan (“PEP”) is also expected to be complete in the fourth quarter of 2021. Subsequently, Board approval for the Production Phase 1 construction plan could be made formalizing a final investment decision. Immediately thereafter, the Company would place orders for long lead items and reserve manufacturing slots with the key vendors whose equipment is part of the construction critical path. Contracts for earthmoving, civil construction, and the orders for long lead items, will be paid for with funds already in the Company treasury and currently earmarked for construction.
Following the successful conclusion of the first phase of FEED, Promon Engenharia Ltda. (“Promon”) and Primero Group Ltd (“Primero”) will remain engaged by the Company and continue to focus on negotiating and securing long lead items for the construction of the Production Plant. The Company is currently negotiating an agreement for the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) of the Production Plant and associated infrastructure with both engineering firms. The Company is also in negotiations with two finalist mining contractors to build and operate the First Mine at the Project.
The Company continued to demonstrate the unique extent and high-purity quality of its hard rock lithium mineralization at the Project and its commercial and market relevance by having significantly advanced its strategic goals on three fronts: short term production scheduled for 2022, the viability of a near-term production expansion contemplated for 2023, and the determination of the ultimate extent of mineral resources at the Project, all while maintaining its strategic leadership in ESG in the lithium supply chain.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 14 |
For further information on the Project, please refer to “Description of the Business – Current Status of the Project”.
On December 1, 2021, the Company filed on SEDAR the Updated Feasibility Study Report in respect of its preliminary economic assessment on Production Phase 2 of the Project. The Updated Feasibility Study Report was prepared by leading mining consultancies and the professional services firms Primero, SGS Canada Lakefield (“SGS”), and GE21 Consultoria Mineral (“GE21”). Please refer to “Description of the Business – Current Status of the Project” and “Summary of Updated Feasibility Study Report”. This approach was the result of a thorough review of the Company´s strategic priorities, with the objective of potentially responding to a significant increase in demand from its customers and solidifying its unique market position as a future supplier of high purity 6% battery grade lithium concentrate (“Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium”). It also aims to significantly increase both the scale of the Project and its commercial and market importance on three fronts: (i) future production, (ii) scale of mineral reserves and (iii) scale of mineral resources, all while maintaining its battery grade green lithium products and the Company’s strategic leadership in ESG in the lithium supply chain.
The Company (prior to the severe second wave of COVID-19) revised its strategy regarding certain international third-party engineering service providers and replaced them with Brazil-based specialists, anticipating the severely restrictive global travel bans that followed in the fourth quarter of 2020 as a result of the second wave. This pre-emptive change enabled the Company to successfully complete all field activities on time and on budget, and to continue to execute engineering activities during the rest of 2021.
In that regard, the Company has also made significant progress in further strengthening its project team, aligning and defining scope requirements as well as advancing the Project’s execution strategy. The Company has added several senior professionals as part of its project implementation team. Key Project consultants include a mix of experienced Brazilian and international engineers actively engaged on or off site, and currently includes GE21, MDGeo Hidrogeologia e Meio Ambiente (“MDGEO”), APL Engenharia (“APL”), Primero, SGS, Metso-Outotec (“Metso”) and SRK Consulting Inc (“SRK”).
The Company added two senior project management professionals to lead the Project Management Office (“PMO”): a senior mineral processing engineer and a senior geotechnical geologist. They report to Calvyn Gardner, one of the Company’s co-CEOs, who has primary responsibility for all technical workstreams and has been based full time at the Project since August 2020. This core team has been providing valuable oversight on project delivery, while interfacing with the detailed engineering team, construction contractors, equipment vendors and other stakeholders, aligning them to the Project objectives. The PMO has established standard management processes and strategies regarding project execution, contract management, project delivery and document controls.
In addition, following the listing on the Nasdaq, the corporate finance and business development teams were also strengthened with the addition of two senior professionals: the company appointed a new CFO and a Director of Business Development and Investor Relations.
Overall, although working under a strict COVID-19 Protocol (the “Protocol”), the Company made significant progress in 2021 to date, despite the circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Protocol was developed in conjunction with Brazilian health advisors, who are consulted on a regular basis to refine and adapt the Protocol to respond to the evolving COVID-19 situation in Brazil. An average of 86 people worked at the Project site, of which only two tested positive for COVID-19. They received prompt medical assistance and have fully recovered. Since the implementation of the Protocol, the Company has not reported any new cases on site. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 situation in Brazil remains challenging. The Company has been actively monitoring any additional impacts on pre-construction activities and the pre-construction schedule. Mandatory mask wearing on site and premises, physical distancing requirements and additional sanitary measures, along with testing measures for workers accessing the site, have brought delays to the expected date to commence production in the fourth quarter of 2022. In addition, the Company continues to support the municipalities of Itinga and Araçuaí in their ongoing response to the pandemic (please refer to “Environmental Social and Governance”).
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 15 |
Further to the information referenced above regarding Production Phase 1, based on the design considered by the Updated Feasibility Study Report, the Production Plant will have the capacity to process 1.5 million metric tonnes of mineralized spodumene material per year from the Project. The Production Plant design is projected to produce 220,000 tonnes of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium per annum, with one of the lowest reported levels of impurities in the world. The Updated Feasibility Study Report assumes: (i) conventional open-pit mining operation; (ii) a low risk approach, building a commercial production plant utilizing conventional lithium Dense Media Separation (“DMS”) and attributing a conservative recovery rate of 60%, (iii) average annual production of 220,000 tonnes of 6% battery grade lithium concentrate, (iv) a mine life of 9.2 years, (v) projected cash operating costs of US$238 per tonne of lithium concentrate (cash cost CIF China of US$ 342 per tonne of lithium concentrate), among the lowest reported costs globally. The Updated Feasibility Study Report estimates were prepared using a cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O and include: (i) a Mineral Reserves estimate of 10.27 million tonnes of proven reserves with average 1.45% Li2O content and 3.52 million tonnes of probable reserves with 1.47% Li2O content, and (ii) a Mineral Resources estimate of 26.34 million tonnes of measured resources with average 1.39% Li2O content, 19.44 million tonnes of indicated resources with average 1.37% Li2O content and 6.6 million tonnes of inferred resources (representing approximately 1,560,919 tonnes of LCE in the measured and indicated categories, with a further 220,070 tonnes LCE in the inferred category).
The positive economics reflected in the Updated Feasibility Study Report provides a strong platform to continue developing the Company’s extensive mineral properties at the Project, which includes nine past-producing lithium mines.
On November 6, 2019, the Company filed the Feasibility Study Report on Production Phase 1 and the Production Plant.
Since the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company has been producing low carbon high purity lithium concentrate at an on-site demonstration pilot plant and has shipped samples to potential customers for product certification and testing (the “Demonstration Plant”). The production from the Demonstration Plant has been an important part of the Company’s successful commercial strategy for its Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium.
On March 23, 2018, Sigma Holdings published a technical report relating to the Project titled “Technical Report, Northern and Southern Complexes Project, Araçuaí and Itinga, Brazil” with an effective date of January 29, 2018 and prepared by Marc-Antoine Laporte, P. Geo, of SGS.
Environmental Social and Governance
In November 2021, Ana Cabral-Gardner, the other co-CEO of the Company, was nominated by a national focal point (“NFP”) as a representative to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change. She actively participated in the event as a speaker, including a panel on the theme “Circular Economy and the 21st Century City: Unlocking the Social & Environmental Benefits of the Sustainable City,” presenting the Company’s project to recycle tailings from its greentech plant and the ensuing economic development impact for the region. Ana also spoke at the main event/Blue Zone regarding “The Future of ESG Investing: Enabling the Energy Transition to a Net Zero World.”
In September 2021, the Company announced the constitution of an environmental sustainability and social impact committee (the “ESG Committee”), created to assist the Board with its ESG centric strategy. Ana Cabral-Gardner and Marcelo Paiva were appointed as co-Chairs of the ESG Committee. Maria Salum, Chief Sustainability Officer will act as senior advisor to the ESG Committee. The purpose of the committee is to advise and support co-CEOs Ana Cabral-Gardner and Calvyn Gardner in determining and implementing the Company’s wide range environmental and social sustainability initiatives, based on the selected sustainable development goals (the “Mission Critical SDGs”) for each of the two aspects of ESG: “E” environmental and “S” social. There are two key initiatives that will be the focus of the Committee: (i) establishing the Investment Agency which encompasses the coordination of the social programs of the Company; and (ii) overseeing strategy and coordinating with Board’s Technical Committee to drive the Company to its ambitious net zero 2024 targets (measured as emissions minus carbon credits), within this Decade of Action and 26 years ahead of United Nations’ 2050 targets.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 16 |
In September 2021, Ana Cabral-Gardner, co-CEO, was invited to the United Nations (“UN”) High-Level Dialogue on Energy Transition that took place in tandem with the UN General Assembly in New York. The Company demonstrated its alignment with the Paris Climate Accord and submitted an Energy Compact proposal committing to supply the production levels of lithium materials to enable energy transition. The Company targeted to reach net zero carbon emissions after its second year of production in 2024 (26 years ahead of UN targets for net zero emissions in 2050 and six years ahead of UN Decade of Action targets outlined at 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on climate change).
Earlier in 2021, the Company commissioned two assessments of its net carbon footprint. It conducted an independent ISO 14000 compliant audit of its life cycle analysis, and is in process to complete an independent expert validation of its carbon credits generated by its internal preservation, reforestation, and compensation forestry programs.
Following the principles of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (“UN-SDGs”), in particular UN-SDG #11 (sustainable cities) and UN-SDG #8 (decent work and economic growth), the Company is leading the creation, structuring and operations of an independent agency to promote private investment and economic diversification of the Vale do Jequitinhonha region, where the Project is located (the “Investment Agency”). The Investment Agency aims to transform the region with organized activities to stimulate development, contributing to the diversification of the business environment through the attraction of investments to the two municipalities of Araçuaí and Itinga in Brazil.
The Company has successfully obtained institutional support for the Investment Agency from the government of Minas Gerais and the Secretary of Special Development Projects (“INDI”) and from the mayors of Araçuaí and Itinga, following the principles of UN-SDG #17 (partnership for the goals). The Company engaged TSX Advisors Ltda (“TSX Advisors”), a specialist consulting firm, to lead the project to structure and implement the Investment Agency. TSX Advisors has a successful track record of executing similar projects for Brazil´s largest mining companies. At a ceremony presided over by the Vice Governor of Minas Gerais, the Investment Agency was launched in September 2021, during the week celebrating the 150 years of establishment of the town of Araçuai.
In 2021, the Company revived and expanded its COVID-19 prevention initiative, distributing an additional 12,000 units of hospital disinfectant (totaling 12 tonnes) as well as 2,400 “family size” hand sanitizers (totaling 840 kg of the product). The Company was able to access the procurement of most of these items at cost as a result of the support of certain of its shareholders. All these actions to combat and prevent COVID-19 were in partnership with the municipalities of Araçuaí and Itinga, that led the logistics of distributing the materials to the end users.
On April 29, 2021, in line with UN-SDGs #17 (partnership for the goals), UN-SDG #1 (no poverty) and UN-SDG #2 (zero hunger), the Company launched “Sigma contra a fome” (Sigma against hunger) - an initiative to provide humanitarian relief during the next 10 months of the pandemic for the population living in poverty. The initiative has been distributing 600 basic food baskets per month to 600 families, totaling 6,000 food baskets (with an average of four people), feeding approximately 2,400 people per month. Additionally, the Company´s initiative fostered the social entrepreneurship of the community, where local businesses, by means of the Rotary Club, matched the initiative and committed to donate 5,000 food baskets. The Company was also an anchor donor to the Rotary Club initiative, donating an additional 1,000 food baskets.
On May 4, 2020, in line with UN-SDG #3 (Good Health and Well Being), the Company announced, as part of its active engagement in the fight against the spread of COVID-19, that it donated 12 tonnes of sodium hypochlorite (hospital sanitizer liquid bleach) in 12,000 bottles to 16 entities in the Vale do Jequitinhonha region, including hospitals, medical clinics, prisons, nursing homes, care centers for people with disabilities and religious entities. This amount was sufficient to supply these entities until December 2020.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 17 |
In addition to the initiatives described above, the Company has ongoing comprehensive environmental and social programs in process, consistent with its leadership role in ESG in the lithium mining sector and its commitment to sustainable mining.
The mitigating social and environmental programs already initiated or to commence during the construction phase aim to establish actions to proactively mitigate, prevent, control and compensate for the environmental impacts that could be caused by mining and processing activities to be carried out by the Company once it commences production. These programs and actions, which are described below, are also based on the UN-SDGs:
· | Programs and actions to commence in the fourth quarter of 2021: the Company expects to complete a program for the implementation and maintenance of rain drainage systems and containment of erosion processes; noise and vibration levels control and monitoring program; and a monitoring program for domestic and industrial effluents. |
· | Programs and actions initiated in the second half of 2021: air emissions control and air quality monitoring programs and surface water quality monitoring program. |
· | Programs and actions initiated in the first half of 2021: program to rescue and drive away the local fauna from industrial site; program to rescue threatened and endemic flora; and a fauna monitoring program. |
· | Programs and Actions initiated in 2020: solid waste management program; waste reuse plan; environmental education program; program for the prioritization and professional training of local suppliers; accident prevention and public health program; social communication program; maintenance and conservation program for permanent preservation areas and legal reserves; environmental management and supervision plan; monitoring program for vegetation planted; program for visual monitoring of environmental impacts and mitigating measures; and specific conservation and monitoring programs for endangered species. |
On November 8, 2019, Ana Cabral-Gardner addressed the World Climate Summit during the UN Climate Change Conference COP-25 in Madrid and presented a case study for the Company as an ESG “green mining” company and the role played by its investors in providing the capital and leadership to drive the implementation of environmental and social best practices in developing the Project.
Corporate
On October 5, 2021, the Company announced the signing of a binding term sheet for an offtake agreement on a “take or pay” basis (the “Offtake”) for the sale of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium to LG Energy Solution, Ltd (“LGES”), one of the world’s largest manufacturers of advanced lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. The six-year Offtake for Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium scales from 60,000 tonnes per year in 2023 to 100,000 tonnes per year from 2024 to 2027 subject to the Company and LGES executing a mutually acceptable definitive documentation to implement the Offtake. The Company and LGES also agreed to negotiate each year, starting in 2022, an additional optional supply of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium, not otherwise committed in other Sigma Lithium offtake arrangements. The purchase price for the Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium under the Offtake will be linked to market prices for the high purity lithium hydroxide during the term of the Offtake. The Offtake is intended to be legally binding on both the Company and LGES, and is subject to, among other things, completion of the negotiation of definitive written agreement(s), which are to be consistent with the agreed terms contained in the binding term sheet.
On September 13, 2021, the Company completed its dual-listing process and the Common Shares began trading in the U.S. on the Nasdaq. The Company is pleased to report that its corporate governance policies and the make up of the Board are compliant with required Nasdaq and SEC governance standards, including Nasdaq’s diversity requirement for a company’s board to have at least one female director and at least one additional diverse director.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 18 |
On September 8, 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Ana Cabral-Gardner as Co-CEO, joining Calvyn Gardner, who was previously CEO and also became Co-CEO as well as the new management appointment of Felipe Peres as Chief Financial Officer. The Company also announced the constitution of an ESG Board Committee resulting from the program intended to achieve Net Zero emissions by 2024 and the issuance of performance-based RSUs to the Co-CEOs.
On June 29, 2021, the Company held the annual and special meeting of the Company’s shareholders. At such meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved: (i) the election of Gary Litwack (independent), Frederico Marques (independent), Calvyn Gardner, Marcelo Paiva, and Ana Cabral-Gardner as the directors of the Company; (ii) the re-appointment of KPMG LLP as the auditors of the Company for the financial year ended December 31, 2021; (iii) a special resolution authorizing and approving the amendment to the Company’s articles to effect the change of the Company’s name from “Sigma Lithium Resources Corporation” to “Sigma Lithium Corporation”; (iv) an ordinary resolution approving the repeal and replacement of the existing by-laws of the Company with a new By-Law No. 1; and (v) a special resolution approving the amendment to the articles of the Company to effect a consolidation of the Common Shares on the basis of one (1) post-consolidation common share for up to ten (10) pre-consolidation common shares, as determined by the Board at its sole discretion.
On February 12, 2021, the Company announced the closing of a non-brokered private placement (the “2021 Offering”) of 9,545,455 Common Shares at a price of Cdn$4.40 per Common Share for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$42.0 million. The size of the 2021 Offering reflected a significant upsizing due to strong institutional investor demand.
On December 7, 2020, the Company announced that it received a binding commitment for a Cdn$18,750,000 (R$75,000,000) credit line (“Development Credit Line”) from Banco de Desenvolvimento de Minas Gerais. The closing of the Development Credit Line is subject to the negotiation of definitive documentation and other customary closing conditions, followed by final credit approval for draw-downs.
On September 25, 2020, the Company announced a management appointment and updates to the Board. The Company appointed Maria Jose Salum as its Chief Sustainability Officer. The Company also announced the constitution of a Technical Board Committee with Wes Roberts and Vicente Lobo as the Co-Chairs. Ana Cabral-Gardner was appointed as Co-Chairman of the Board, joining Calvyn Gardner, who was previously Chairman and also became Co-Chairman of the Board.
On August 13, 2020, the Company announced the closing of a non-brokered private placement (the “2020 Offering”) of 8,250,200 Common Shares at a price of Cdn$2.15 per Common Share for aggregate gross proceeds of US$13.3 million (approximately Cdn$17.8 million). The size of the 2020 Offering reflected an upsizing by one-third from the original intended amount announced on July 27, 2020, due to strong institutional investor demand.
On June 29, 2020, the Company announced the signing of a term sheet for a US$45 million senior secured project finance facility (the “Bank Project Finance Facility”) to be led by Societe Generale. The consummation of the Bank Project Finance Facility remains subject to completion of due diligence, credit approval, the negotiation of definitive documentation and other customary closing conditions.
A10 Group has supported the Company´s liquidity needs without additional equity incentives on two occasions, both in connection with then challenging capital markets conditions:
1) | On November 29, 2019, in order to fund its working capital, the Company entered into an agreement with the A10 Group providing for a Cdn$6.6 million (US$5.0 million) revolving credit facility (the “Unsecured Credit Facility Agreement”), bearing interest at 11% per annum, calculated from the day funds were drawn. The Unsecured Credit Facility Agreement did not include any warrants or other incentives. It had a one-year term, which was the maturity for all funds drawn, and allowed funding for lender-approved expenses. Its term was extended twice by A10 Group, for both principal and accrued interest, without any penalties or additional charges until September 2021, when it was repaid in full. |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 19 |
2) | During March of 2018, A10 Group, provided several bridge loans to the Company in the aggregate amount of R$1,747,600 (US$595,932) with interest calculated pursuant to the CDI (Brazilian Interbank Rate) plus a 4% per year spread, accrued from the date of each disbursement. The bridge loans had due dates on April 30 and May 30, 2018 and were automatically renewable on a rolling basis. On July 18, 2018, the loans were repaid in full. |
On April 5, 2019, the Company announced the execution of a binding heads of agreement with Mitsui & Co. Ltd. (“Mitsui”) (the “Mitsui HOA”). In accordance with the Mitsui HOA, Mitsui would prepay the Company the amount of US$30,000,000 for battery grade lithium concentrate supply of up to 80,000 tonnes annually over six years, extendable for another five years at the option of Mitsui. The initial tranche payment of US$3,000,000 was received by the Company on April 4, 2019 and recorded as deferred revenue, while disbursement of the remaining tranches is to occur subject to certain conditions, including obtaining senior debt commitments for the remaining amount of the estimated Capex for the construction of the Production Plant. The consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Mitsui HOA remain subject to the negotiation of definitive documentation and other customary conditions.
On January 9, 2019, the Company announced an increase in mineral resource at the Project, and certain other updates to the Board and management of the Company.
On April 30, 2018, the Sigma Merger Transaction was completed. In connection with the Sigma Merger Transaction, Sigma Holdings completed a $20,040,000 private placement offering of subscription receipts, which were exchanged for pre-consolidation Common Shares upon the implementation of the Sigma Merger Transaction.
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
Overview
Sigma is a Canadian mineral processing and development company, focused on advancing, with an environmental sustainability directed strategy, one of the largest hardrock lithium projects in the Americas - its wholly-owned Grota do Cirilo Project, located in Minas Gerais in Brazil - with the goal of participating in the rapidly expanding lithium-ion battery supply chain for EVs.
In order to secure a leading position supplying environmentally sustainable lithium for the next generation of EV supply chains, the Company has adhered consistently to the highest principles and standards of ESG practices, which were established as part of its core purpose at inception in 2012. As a result, the Company has undertaken an ESG-centric management strategy, whereby its environmental and social sustainability purposes determine its strategic steps.
Sigma´s Common Shares are listed and trade on the TSXV and Nasdaq under the symbol SGML.
Lithium Properties
The Project comprises four properties owned by Sigma Brazil: Grota do Cirilo (the area of the Project where the First Mine and Second Mine are located), and the Sao Jose, Genipapo and Santa Clara properties. The Project consists of 27 mineral rights (which include mining concessions, applications for mining concessions, exploration authorizations and applications for mineral exploration authorizations) spread over 191 km2. Within the Project area there are nine past producing lithium mines and 11 first-priority development targets.
The Project is located in the northeastern part of the state of Minas Gerais, in the municipalities of Araçuaí́ and Itinga, approximately 25 km east of the town of Araçuaí́ and 600 km northeast of Belo Horizonte, the state capital. The Project is approximately 500km from the Port of Ilheus, from where samples have been shipped for product certification and testing and from where future production is planned to be shipped.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 20 |
Current Status of the Project
The Project will be vertically integrated, as the Company´s own mining operations will supply mineralized spodumene material with exceptional mineralogy to its lithium production and processing plant (the “Production Plant”). The Production Plant is designed to be environmentally friendly, fully automated and digitally controlled separating, purifying and concentrating the spodumene in an environmentally friendly process to produce Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium, engineered to the specifications of the Company’s customers in the rapidly expanding lithium-ion battery supply chain for EVs.
The Production Plant is planned to have two separate production lines with similar processing flowsheets, which are projected to share certain elements of a common plant infrastructure. The first phase of production for the Project (“Production Phase 1”) is the subject of the feasibility study analysis included in the Updated Feasibility Study Report. It will initially utilize as feedstock spodumene from the Project’s Xuxa deposit (the “First Mine”). Its detailed design has been completed and the capital expenditures are being confirmed with firm quotes by suppliers to reach FEL-3 stage of precision. Based on the Updated Feasibility Study Report, the Company plans to produce 220,000 tonnes per year of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium (33,000 tonnes per year of lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”)) in Production Phase 1 and expects to be amongst the world’s lowest cost producers.
The next production phase of the Project (“Production Phase 2”) has been the subject of the preliminary economic assessment (the “PEA”) included in the Updated Feasibility Study Report, and could potentially increase production utilizing feedstock from the Project’s Barreiro deposit (the “Second Mine”). GE21, based on the Mineral Resource, prepared the PEA for the Second Mine. The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. It is noted that the Company has not yet made a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. The Company expects that it will assess the results of a pre-feasibility study and a definitive feasibility study before making a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. All statements regarding mine development or production in respect of the Second Mine in this AIF are expressly qualified by this statement.
The Company completed the PEA with the objective of potentially responding to a significant increase in demand from its customers and solidifying its unique market position as a future supplier of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium. As reflected in the Updated Feasibility Study Report, the PEA projects significant economies of scale for Production Phase 2 (if warranted, following completion of the ongoing pre-feasibility study and definitive feasibility study), resulting from the low capital expenditure (“CAPEX”) of adding a second environmentally-friendly lithium processing line and vertically integrating it to the Project, mining an average of 1.68 million tonnes (“Mt”) per year during approximately 12.7 years of projected mine life.
The Company also commenced a further pre-feasibility study for Production Phase 2 contemplating the addition of a second processing line with similar capacity of 220,000 tonnes per year of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium from Production Phase 1 (once onstream in 2022), therefore potentially doubling the Project total capacity to 440,000 tonnes per year (66,000 tonnes per year of LCE) of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium. Production Phase 2 is expected to benefit from economies of scale by utilizing most of the Production Plant infrastructure established for Production Phase 1.
This approach is the result of a thorough review of the Company´s strategic priorities in light of the significant change in lithium market conditions and aims to significantly increase both the scale of the Project and its commercial and market importance on three fronts: future production, scale of mineral resources and of mineral reserves, all the while maintaining its battery grade green lithium products and the Company’s strategic leadership in environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) in the lithium supply chain.
The Company is accelerating its site exploration activities for the Project with the goal of increasing the Project mine life or potentially increasing production at expanded production levels in Production Phase 2, if warranted after completing the ongoing pre-feasibility study (and definitive feasibility study) or a third production expansion phase (“Production Phase 3”) if warranted following completion of further feasibility study.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 21 |
The Production Plant has a lithium processing design that includes dense media separation (“DMS”) technology which does not utilize hazardous chemicals in the separation and purification of the lithium. The Company will apply a customized algorithm developed to contemplate the specificities of the mineralogy in each of the Company’s mines to digitally control the dense media levels in the Production Plant.
In addition, the Production Plant will be 100% powered by clean energy and it will use water efficiently, while preserving land ecosystems when production scales. As a result of state-of-the-art recirculation and tailings management circuits:
· | the tailings will be dry stacked (and therefore will not create a tailings dam). Because the DMS technology of the Production Plant does not utilize hazardous chemicals, the dry-stacked tailings materials could also be entirely recyclable as feed for ancillary industries, such as ceramics |
· | the water utilized in the production process is 100% recirculated into the plant. Approximately 10% of the water is either lost or evaporates, with 90% of water consumed in the production process reutilized back into the Production Plant, achieving a high level of water efficiency |
Since the fourth quarter of 2018, Sigma Brazil has been producing low carbon high purity lithium concentrate at an on-site Demonstration Plant and has shipped samples to potential customers for product certification and testing. This demonstration production has been an important part of the successful commercial strategy of the Company for its Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium.
The Company expects to submit a net zero execution plan to achieve its emission reduction targets after its second year of full operations, expected to be in 2024, partly as a result of its strategic decision to decrease emissions through the introduction of biofuels to fuel the trucks and other heavy equipment of the mining fleet starting in the second year of production. The Company also plans to pursue generation of carbon credits through “in-setting” strategies such as preserving water streams and developing the agroforestry systems within its regional ecosystem. As part of that strategy, the Company is studying future partnerships with generators of renewable power for self-generation of the electricity required to power the Production Plant.
Operations Overview
Detailed Engineering and Conclusion of Pre-Construction Activities for the Production Plant
The FEED work progressed well in the third quarter. Key achievements during this period include:
· | Material Take-Offs (“MTOs”) and revised equipment lists issued for CAPEX updates |
· | Detail of the MTOs issued and revisions in all lay-out drawings |
· | 3D Model 30% progress review completed for the DMS plant and crushing circuit. Modelling effort for the FEED phase is effectively completed |
· | Detail design schedule issued for review |
· | Carried out constructability review of DMS plant and completed tables outlining required construction sequence |
· | Larger crushing equipment (Primary, Secondary and Tertiaries) was defined and incorporated in current design |
· | Adjustment of the associated equipment, platework, steel and concrete |
Promon continued to organize meetings with vendors for various critical packages as per the Company’s request to optimize the number and ordering of long lead times.
The PEP in progress contemplates a procurement strategy formulated to derive maximum CAPEX effectiveness, protecting shareholder returns. This workstream is currently being led by the Company’s Project management team, Promon and TSX Advisors, a consulting company specializing in domestic and global procurement, including equipment and import logistics to Brazil.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 22 |
Production Plant EPCM
The design related activities of the Production Plant have been completed, aiming to ensure a rapid start to the Project following a final investment decision. All designs completed include consideration for a future parallel Production Phase 2 plant.
The related infrastructure design is complete. All long lead items have been identified and are currently being negotiated and secured. Discussions are being held with vendors to reduce delivery times and establish requirements to reserve manufacturing slots.
The Company is in contract negotiations to engage Promon as the EPCM contractor for Project execution and Primero to provide engineering services for the Production Plant, equipment and field services during construction. For a detailed outline of the work breakdown outlining the division engineering and design between Promon and Primero during the Project execution stage, see the most recent interim MD&A of the Company under the heading “Production Plant EPCM”.
Detailed engineering will be developed in a collaborative manner between Promon, Primero and the Company using the FEED documents that will be revised and/or new documents to be developed as applicable, considering the division of responsibilities defined in the document.
The responsibility for the development of detailed design of Area 700 - Mining will be divided between the mining engineering subconsultant and mining contractor, who will be also responsible for haul roads design. Promon will only develop the design of the access roads.
Procurement services considered under the EPCM contractor’s scope encompass the phases of supplier list definition (together with the Company): request for quotation, tabulation of commercial proposals, commercial negotiations and issuance of purchase recommendation, kick-off meeting with the chosen supplier, expediting of supplier documentation during the project period and management of the company contracted by the Company expediting and inspecting the supplies and receiving on the field, as detailed in the activities below.
The following items describe the activities to be developed by the Company, in conjunction with Promon's construction and safety management team, throughout the execution of the construction:
· | Manage the execution and certify the quality of the execution of the Project |
· | Analyze, criticize and propose containment, prevention and correction measures, continuously and proactively, for the management of the entire implementation of the Project (covering all aspects of Health & Safety, environment, quality, schedule, costs and scope) |
· | Manage the expediting of supply processes, to be executed by a specialized company to be hired by the Company |
· | Manage the quality of the Project implementation |
· | Coordination of commissioning activities, together with assembly contractors and equipment and systems suppliers, testing and delivery of the Project |
· | Manage, supervise and enforce labor, social security and tax standards and the client's specific corporate and specific standards with contractors: occupational safety and health - H&S, environmental, technical, others |
Commissioning and Startup
Promon’s scope includes the Project future commissioning and startup management, with the support of the Company's operational team, equipment suppliers and assembler, including the following activities:
· | Preparation of commissioning and testing procedures of the implemented facilities and systems |
· | Monitoring of commissioning tests and analysis of the respective issued reports |
· | Identification, registration and communication of non-conformities related to commissioning and tests procedures |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 23 |
· | Monitoring and updating the backlog |
· | Control of commissioning tests reports issuance |
· | Expediting, together with the contractors, the sending of the data-books, available for the pre¬operational phase |
· | Coordination of interfaces between contractors. |
· | Primero’s assistance will be secured for commissioning. |
Capex Estimation (IPA Front End Loading FEL-3)
Promon is currently undertaking a series of engineering tasks to prepare a comprehensive CAPEX estimation at FEL-3 level of confidence for the Production Plant (with FEED documentation), including overall planning of the Project, 3D models, the bulk site earthworks and site layouts. Promon will develop the following items: (i) ROM pad, including retaining wall structures, (ii) Settlement ponds, (iii) Site Wide Bulk Earthworks, including the following areas: Greentech process circuits and infrastructure and water capture, (iv) General site drainage.
Mining
The responsibility for the development of detailed engineering of mining related infrastructure will be divided between the mining engineering subconsultant and mining contractor, that will also be responsible for haul roads design. Promon is to complement this scope, developing the engineering and design of: (i) mining general - access roads, (ii) mining infrastructure and services - fire hydrants, (iii) fuels storage and distribution.
Pre-Construction Outlook for the First Mine (Production Phase 1)
The First Mine will supply 100% of the feedstock for the Production Plant during Production Phase 1, creating a fully integrated and low-cost operation. The Company and GE21 are in the process of completing a final scenario for an optimized mine design for the First Mine to supply the Production Plant for eight years, potentially integrating with an eventual Second Mine (should its feasibility study so warrant) as the feedstock for the production of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium.
The Company has successfully completed several critical workstreams involved in the pre-construction of the First Mine within the scheduled and budgeted parameters. This includes all activities required for the geotechnical validation at detailed engineering level, as well as critical hydrogeological analysis and validation (including the installation of 12 piezometers for ongoing monitoring).
The Company is currently optimizing the mining plan with two pit layouts under consideration, including preparation of detailed mine production sequencing.
These validations at detailed engineering confidence levels were initiated as a result of the Company’s ESG-centered strategy. A key element of the environmental strategy for Production Phase 1, as detailed in the Updated Feasibility Study Report, was the decision to open the First Mine as two separate pits to preserve the Piauí river’s seasonal “stream” and its surrounding ecosystems (collectively, the “Piaui”). This decision was a result of the Piaui´s pivotal role in providing the only source of freshwater for the surrounding communities for four to five months of the year during the rainy season (the Project is located within a semi-arid region with extended dry season). The following workstreams of the pre-construction for the First Mine have been completed:
· | Completed 100% of geotechnical workstreams and refined North and South pit designs and pit wall slopes of the First Mine. Completed 100% of geotechnical modeling and analysis. All planned additional geotechnical holes were successfully drilled with core orientations targeting all wall orientations (i.e. hanging wall, end walls, and footwall). |
· | The Company, GE21 and MDGEO completed 100% of hydrogeological workstreams. The Company decided to conduct a hydrogeology detailed assessment and complete a model of groundwater pathways to increase confidence that, in the scenario of climate change substantially altering rainfall patterns in the region (increasing seasonal water flows at the Piaui), the Company would be equipped with information to determine the most suitable pit dewatering methodology. Piezometers were installed for ongoing analysis of data for subsequent geo-hydrogeological modelling during the first year |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 24 |
· | The Company and GE21 are in the process of completing a final scenario for an optimized mine design for the First Mine. It has the benefit of enhancing the life cycle analysis of the Project by substantially decreasing its carbon footprint by: (i) decreasing the vegetation suppression of trees in the construction of the pit to less than 50 hectares and (ii) segregation of mine waste piles and processed tailings with the goal of future recycling as feed for ancillary industries, promoting a circular economy |
The following pre-construction activities have been concluded for the First Mine:
· | Completed the strategic monthly mining sequencing plan for the first three years of the life of mine, then quarterly for year four and annually for the remaining years |
· | Completed the design of final pit (with final operating parameters: berm, ramp, ultimate wall slope angles) |
· | Developed a comprehensive grade control program utilizing geostatistical methods to ensure feed grades are maintained within the expected range. The proposed grade control system will be designed to minimize schist waste rock dilution with the pegmatite ore recovery in pit |
· | Finalization of the waste piles design |
· | Designing the ROM pad for Production Phase 1 together with Promon |
Preliminary Economic Assessment, Pre-Feasibility and Feasibility Studies for Increased Scale in Production Phase 2
The Company continues to advance multiple Project workstreams in geology, geotechnical, metallurgical, environmental and regulatory permitting with the objective of preparing for Production Phase 2 after 2023. The Company completed the PEA for the Second Mine and Production Phase 2, filing the Updated Feasibility Study Report on July 15, 2021. The PEA contemplated utilizing as feedstock the mineralized spodumene material from the Second Mine (Barreiro Mine) with the objective of significantly increasing production.
The Company has engaged SGS, Primero and GE21 to build on the results of the PEA and prepare pre-feasibility and feasibility studies for Production Phase 2, adding to the Production Plant a second similar DMS processing line with capacity of 220,000 tonnes per year (33,000 LCE) of battery grade high purity lithium concentrate. The results of the various workstreams are planned to be completed in stages. Following the PEA, the pre-feasibility study is to be completed during December 2021.
The PEA demonstrated the significant cost benefit of vertically integrating a second production line and utilizing as feedstock the mineralized spodumene material from the Second Mine, potentially mining an average of 1.68Mt per year during 12.7years of mine life.
The Second Mine is the Project’s largest deposit. It is a high-purity, high-grade lithium deposit, with 19.58Mt of measured and indicated mineral resources at 1.43% Li2O and 1.76Mt of inferred mineral resources at 1.45% Li2O suitable for open pit mining.
Additional drilling continues seeking to both increase the mineral resource and to strengthen the geological data for the mineral resource model.
GE21, based on the Mineral Resource, prepared the PEA for the Second Mine. The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. It is noted that the Company has not yet made a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. The Company expects that it will assess the results of a pre-feasibility study and a definitive feasibility study before making a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. All statements regarding mine development or production in respect of the Second Mine in this AIF are expressly qualified by this statement.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 25 |
The Company and Primero completed all the metallurgical and variability pre-feasibility test work at SGS laboratories with the aim of customizing a flowsheet for the processing line of Production Phase 2 with the Barreiro deposit.
· | The heavy liquid separation testing results achieved 66% Li2O recovery |
· | This was followed by pilot plant scale DMS metallurgical testing, which achieved 60.7% Li2O recovery producing a battery grade concentrate of 6.11% Li2O |
· | The processing and metallurgy tests achieved good lithium recoveries in an environmentally friendly DMS plant, with similar flowsheet (and capital costs) to the first production line, without requiring a more capital-intensive and less environmentally friendly flotation process. |
· | These DMS recoveries are a result of the Second Mine having a similar exceptional mineralization to the First Mine |
The Company completed all field work for the preparation of a Phase 2 pre-feasibility study, including geotechnical drilling and hydrogeology test work. Following the completion of the additional drilling program, GE21 will complete the mining plan, geotechnical program and modelling of the Barreiro deposit. The field work required for the hydrogeological section of the pre-feasibility study has been completed, as all groundwater level measurements have been completed.
Environmental Impact Study for Phase 2 Production
The Company conducted detailed environmental impact studies for the fauna and the flora in the area of the Barreiro deposit where the pit and waste piles will be located. These studies started in the dry season of the second quarter of 2020 and continued throughout the wet season during the third and fourth quarters of 2020. The environmental impact studies as well as a comprehensive environmental and social impact assessment report (“EIA/RIMA”) are ongoing by the Company.
The design proposed by the Company in the EIA/RIMA for the area directly impacted by the Project (the “Project Impacted Area”) has followed the Company´s ESG-centric approach to minimize distances by combining the minimization of greenhouse gas emissions of diesel in mining trucks with a minimization of semi-arid bush and vegetation suppression. Therefore, the Company contemplated the location of its processing tailings dry stacking piles in the vicinity of the Production Plant. As a result, the life cycle analysis of the Company is substantially enhanced, decreasing environmental and carbon footprints.
Once the EIA/RIMA is approved by regulators, a permit for the construction and installation of the Second Mine (LP/LI) as well as operation permits from environmental authorities will be required.
Exploration & Development of Other Deposits in the Project Area
The Company is accelerating its site exploration activities for the Project with the goal of potentially increasing the Project mine life at the expanded production levels of 440,000 tonnes per year of Production Phase 2 or potentially increasing production output after 2024 in a third production phase should EV penetration growth continue to accelerate, and lithium demand forecasts continue to demonstrate strength. The objective of the exploration program is to substantially increase estimated mineral resources during the first quarter of 2022.
The Company’s dedicated geological teams and SGS Canada are carrying out an exploration program to determine the ultimate extent of the property mineralization and more rapidly increase the scale of estimated mineral resources, while demonstrating the uniqueness of the high-purity quality of its hard rock lithium mineralization.
· | The Company has continued to conduct a campaign to diamond drill the remaining 10,000 meters (in a campaign targeting 20,000 meters) to further define current mineralized structures validated in the Updated Feasibility Study Report, increasing the scale of known deposits |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 26 |
· | In addition, it has focused on five other targets, previously identified by historical mining and surface trenching |
This geology workstream did not impact the Phase 1 Production pre-construction workstreams as it is managed by a separate geological team. This geological team is currently operating with five drill rigs on two shifts and adding a sixth rig in Q4 2021.
· | Additionally, the Company´s geological teams continued to evaluate the potential of known deposits that were not included in the mineral resource estimate in the Updated Feasibility Study Report. Two deposits with significant potential were targeted with diamond drilling campaigns |
· | The Company focused the 2021 drilling campaign in an area with pegmatite surface exposure that returned promising results in the 2018-2019 drilling program. This regional exploration program, of drilling designed to test the target object was very positive, totaling 6538m in 47 positive holes. An additional 5,000m of drilling will be made, totaling 11,537m by the end of 2021. The drilling will be completed on 100m x 50m spacing along a 500m open strike |
Additional operational and business updates in respect of the Company and the Project are provided in the Company’s most recently filed MD&A.
Royalties
The Brazilian government levies a royalty on mineral production: Compensação Financeira pela Exploração de Recursos Minerais (“CFEM”). Lithium production is subject to a 2% CFEM royalty, payable on the gross income from sales. The Project is also subject to two third-party royalties:
(i) | an NSR royalty (“NSR Royalty”) of 1% over the gross revenues of the Company from sales of minerals extracted from the Project less all taxes and costs incurred in the process of extraction, production, processing, treatment, transportation and commercialization of the products sold. The NSR Royalty can be “put by the owner” and “called by the Company” for US$ 3.8 million, once the Company reaches commercial production of 40,000 tonnes of lithium concentrate |
(ii) | another one that provides to the holder (currently LRC LP I) a royalty of 1% over the gross revenues of the Company from sales of minerals extracted from the Project, less taxes, returns and sale commissions (“Net Revenue Royalty”) |
Life Cycle Analysis and Net Zero Strategy
The Company has engaged Minviro Ltd. for the preparation of an independent ISO 14000 compliant life cycle assessment (“LCA”). The Company has engaged BeZero Carbon Ltd for the assessment of the Company´s internal carbon offsetting projects (“in-setting projects”) and advisory on a portfolio of carbon additional in-setting projects and initiatives which the company may undertake in order to deliver its plans to make a robust net zero declaration by 2024.
The objectives of both workstreams are to understand the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the positive activities of carbon sequestering undertaken by the Company, link the results to the overall carbon footprint of existing and planned operations, create an in-setting and offsetting plan for residual emissions and provide an evidence-based assessment for the Company´s net zero targets. The Company will take responsibility for all of its expected scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, as is the expectation in today’s international carbon accounting environment for maximizing the robustness and defensibility of the Company’s strategy. Net zero targets will be undertaken in two phases: (i) Net zero by 2023: incorporating scope 3 emissions from mine to port of shipment in Brazil; (ii) deliver its plans to make a robust Net zero declaration by 2024: incorporating scope 3 emissions at port of delivery.
The study and the audit are contemplating its production route of Battery Grade Green and Sustainable Lithium with spodumene mining and lithium purification and concentration production in Brazil. The final ISO 14000 audit report is ongoing and will include: (i) a cradle to grave life cycle inventory and impact assessment to generate impact data for climate change, water consumption, land use and certain impact categories selected by the Company, and (ii) a complete contribution analysis outlining the major inputs contributing to the impact categories.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 27 |
The Company expects to publish results from the LCA in the first quarter of 2022, including its carbon insetting and off-setting strategies. The Company plans to adapt to the most up to date norms in the industry, as this is an important pillar of the Company’s plans to develop and maintain a net zero strategy, while the expectations and norms for offsetting and emissions reporting continue to evolve.
Environmental Licensing and Permitting
In August 2020, the Company filed at SUPPRI (the “Priority Projects Superintendence of Minas Gerais”) a complementary environmental impact study and environmental mitigation plan (the “Complementary EIA/RIMA”) to the Company´s current environmental license for construction of Production Phase 1. The objective was to increase the scope area (Area Diretamente Afetada) of its current construction and installation license to include the south pit of the First Mine.
The Complementary EIA/RIMA contemplates the simultaneous mining of both north and south pits of the First Mine, potentially also supplying the mineralized spodumene material for the first few years of Production Phase 2. The Complementary EIA/RIMA also includes a dry stacking tailings plan that separates rock waste and tailings piles in order to allow for the potential recycling of 100% of the tailings to ancillary industries, such as ceramics.
The south pit of the First Mine is being designed to have the lowest possible environmental impact and greatest socioeconomic return. The simultaneous mining of the north pit and the south pit by the Company to feed the Production Plant will allow the municipality of Araçuaí (where the south pit is located) to receive royalties from mining (“CFEM”), previously restricted to the municipality of Itinga, where the north pit is located, spreading financial prosperity to both municipalities, meeting SDG # 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions).
Concurrent environmental licensing is required for construction and installation (which comprises pre-operation and commissioning of the production plant, including pre-stripping and all mining required for commissioning). An operating license (“LO”) is required for the commercial operations, when external sales of the products are conducted.
The Company obtained the required environmental licenses for both construction (“LP”) and installation and commissioning (“LI”) of the Production Plant from the environmental authority of the State of Minas Gerais (the “LP/LI Environmental License”), the Council of Environmental Policy (Conselho Estadual de Politica Ambiental or “COPAM”) in Brazil. COPAM issued a dual LP and LI Certificate in June 2019 for a period of six years expiring on May 31, 2025. The LP/LI Environmental License permits the Company to build the First Mine and Production Plant and to install the plant, conduct trial mining, and testing of the DMS beneficiation process of mineralized spodumene material into battery grade lithium concentrate building a reserve stockpile for future sale.
The Company's mining easement request (“Servidão Mineral”) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federal Government on July 29, 2020. This is an important step towards obtaining the operational license (licença operacional, LO) required after commissioning and ramp-up in order for the Project to enter full scale Production Phase 1. It contemplates the mining and processing activities of the First Mine.
The Company has a definitive water usage license for the construction of the Production Plant, which was granted by ANA (Agência Nacional de Águas), the Federal Government’s water agency, in February 2019. The water usage license is valid for 10 years, which is expected to be sufficient for the life-of mine (LOM) requirements for mining and product processing from Production Phase 1, as currently planned by the Company. The water usage license received should also be sufficient to process lithium mineralized material at the planned rate of production of an expected 440,000 tonnes of lithium concentrate as well as additional production phases contemplated, subject to confirmation by feasibility studies.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 28 |
Surface Rights and Other Permitting
Certain surface rights in the Production Phase 1 area, the current primary focus of the Company’s activity, are held by two companies owned by the co-CEOs of the Company, Arqueana Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. (“Arqueana”) and Miazga Participações S.A. (“Miazga”). The Company has entered into two right-of-way agreements with these companies to support its exploration and development activities within the Grota do Cirilo property, as well as with third-party surface owners in the Project area.
The Company has a mining easement (Servidão Mineral) with a total of 413.3 hectares and aims to cover the areas of waste and tailings piles, Production Plant, all access roads (internal), electrical substation, installation of fueling station and support structures. The Servidão Mineral was published in the Official Gazette of the Federal Government. It contemplates the mining and processing activities of the First Mine (ANM Process No. 824.692/1971).
The Company also obtained a key approval for Production Phase 2 plan with the Agência Nacional de Mineração (the “ANM”) approving its economic feasibility study (“Plano Econômico de Avaliação” - PAE). This approval advanced the Production Phase 2 permitting process to the mining concession request stage (“Requerimento de Concessão de Lavra”).
The Company holds approved economic mining plans (Plano de Aproveitamento Econômico or PAE) over the Xuxa, Barreiro, Lavra do Meio, Murial, and Maxixe deposits within the Grota do Cirilo property. The Brazilian government levies a royalty on mineral production: Compensação Financeira pela Exploração de Recursos Minerais (CFEM). Lithium production is subject to a 2.0% CFEM royalty, payable on the gross income from sales. The Xuxa Project is also subject to two third-party royalties, one on the net income from sales and the other on a net smelter return (NSR), of 1% each.
Specialized Skills and Knowledge
All aspects of the Company’s business require specialized skills and knowledge. Such skills and knowledge include the areas of geology, drilling, logistics planning and implementation of exploration programs as well as regulatory, finance and accounting. To date, the Company has been able to locate and retain such professionals from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Russia, South Africa and the UK, and believes it will be able to continue to do so. The Company relies upon its management, employees and various consultants for such expertise.
Mineral Price and Economic Cycles
The mining business is subject to mineral price cycles. The marketability of minerals and mineral concentrates is also affected by worldwide economic cycles. Lithium markets are affected by demands for lithium batteries and global economic conditions. Fluctuations in supply and demand in various regions throughout the world are common.
Economic Dependence
The Company’s business is dependent on the exploration, development and operation of lithium properties and the EV market. The Company does not expect to be dependent on any sole contract to sell the major part of the Company’s products or services or to purchase the major part of the Company’s requirements for goods, services or raw materials.
Bankruptcy and Similar Procedures
There are no bankruptcies, receivership or similar proceedings against the Company, nor is the Company aware of any such pending or threatened proceedings. The Company has not commenced any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings during the Company’s history.
Reorganizations
There have been no corporate reorganizations of the Company within the three most recently completed financial years.
Foreign Operations
The Project exposes the Company to various degrees of political, economic and other risks and uncertainties. See “Emerging Market Disclosure” and “Risk Factors” below.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 29 |
Employees
As at December 31, 2020, the Company had eight employees and sixteen part time and/or consultants working at various locations.
Environmental Protection
The current and future operations of the Company, including exploration and development activities, are subject to extensive laws and regulations governing environmental protection, employee health and safety, exploration, development, tenure, production, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection and remediation of environment, reclamation, mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. Compliance with such laws and regulations can increase the costs of, and potentially delay planning, designing, drilling and developing the Company’s mineral properties, including the Project.
Social and Environmental Policies
The Company aims to minimize the impact of its operations on both local communities and the environment. The Company is committed to developing the Project in a responsible and sustainable manner. The Company takes its responsibilities seriously to protect the environment, to conduct business based on high ethical standards and to make a positive difference in the communities in which it operates.
SUMMARY OF UPDATED FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT
Set out below is an extract from the Updated Feasibility Study Report dated November 22, 2021, with an effective date of June 2, 2021, prepared by by Homero Delboni Jr, B.E., M.Eng.Sc., Ph.D., Guilherme Gomides Ferreira (MEng) MAIG, Marc-Antoine Laporte, P. Geo, Stephane Normandin, P. Eng., Jacques Parent, P.Eng., Jarrett Quinn, P.Eng., Porifrio Cabaleiro Rodriguez, MEng., and Jacqueline Wang, P.Eng. (the “FS Qualified Persons”). Reference should be made to the full text of the Updated Feasibility Study Report, which is the current technical report on the Project, is available on the Company’s website at www.sigmalithium.ca or at www.sedar.com and is incorporated by reference into this AIF, for the detailed disclosure in respect of the Project. All statements in the summary below are as of the effective date of the Updated Feasibility Study Report.
Property Description and Location
The Project is located in Northeastern Minas Gerais State, in the municipalities of Araçuaí and Itinga, approximately 25 km east of the town of Araçuaí and 450 km northeast of Belo Horizonte.
The Project comprises four properties owned by Sigma Brazil and is divided into the Northern Complex (the Grota do Cirilo, Genipapo and Santa Clara properties) and the Southern Complex (the São José property).
The Project consists of 27 mineral rights, which include mining concessions, applications for mining concessions and exploration permits, spread over 191 km2, which include nine past producing lithium mines and 11 first-priority exploration targets. Granted mining concessions are in good standing with the Brazilian authorities.
The surface rights in the Grota do Cirilo area, the current primary focus of activity, are held by two companies, Arqueana Minérios e Metais (Arqueana) and Miazga Participações S.A. (Miazga). Sigma Brazil has entered into two right-of-way agreements with these companies to support the Company’s exploration and development activities within the Grota do Cirilo property, as well as third-party surface owners.
The Company has been granted a flow of 150 m3/h from the Jequitinhonha River for all months of the year for a period of 10 years, which is sufficient for life-of mine (LOM) requirements.
The Brazilian Government levies a Compensação Financeira pela Exploração de Recursos Minerais (CFEM) royalty on mineral production. Lithium production is subject to a 2.0% CFEM royalty, payable on the gross income from sales. The Project is subject to two third-party net smelter return (NSR) royalties of 1% each.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 30 |
To the extent known to the FS Qualified Persons, there are no other significant factors and risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform work on the Project that have not been discussed in the Updated Feasibility Study Report.
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
The Project is easily accessible from regional paved road BR-367, which runs through the northern part of the Project. Within the Project area, accessibility is provided by a network of maintained arterial and back country service roads. A municipal airport services the town of Araçuaí. The closest major domestic airport is located at Montes Claros, 327 km west of Araçuaí.
The Eastern Brazil region is characterized by a dry, semi-arid and hot climate. It is expected that future mining operations could be conducted year-round. Exploration activities are year-round but can be interrupted by short-term rainfall events.
Mining operations have been previously conducted in the Project area. Existing infrastructure includes power supply and substation, an extensive office block equipped with internet and telephones, accommodation for 40 persons on site, dining hall and kitchen, workshop, on-site laboratory and sample storage building, warehouse and a large store, a fuel storage facility with pumping equipment, and a water pumping facility from the Jequitinhonha river with its reservoir. The main 138 kV transmission line from the Irape hydro power station runs through the northern part of the Project area. The town of Araçuaí can supply basic services. Other services must be sourced from Belo Horizonte or São Paulo.
The topography consists of gently rolling hills with less than 100 m difference in elevation. The Project area typically hosts thorn scrub and savannah. Much of the area has been cleared for agriculture. The primary source of water for this project is the Jequitinhonha River.
History
Exploration and mining activities prior to the Company’s project interest were conducted by Companhia Estanìfera do Brazil (CEBRAS), Arqueana Minérios e Metais (Arqueana), Tanex Resources plc (Tanex; a subsidiary of Sons of Gwalia Ltd (Sons of Gwalia)), and RI-X Mineração S.A. (RI-X). CEBRAS produced a tin/tantalite concentrate from open pit mines from 1957 to the 1980s. Arqueana operated small open pit mines from the 1980s to the 2000s, exploiting pegmatite and alluvial gravel material for tin and tantalite. Tanex Resources obtained a project interest from Arqueana, and undertook channel sampling, air-track, and reverse circulation (RC) drilling. The Project was subsequently returned to Arqueana. In 2012, RI-X obtained a controlling interest in Arqueana, and formed a new subsidiary company to Arqueana called Araçuaí Mineração whose name was later changed to Sigma Brazil. Sigma Brazil completed mapping, data compilation, a ground magnetic survey, channel sampling, and HQ core drilling. A heavy mineral separation (HMS) pilot plant was built during 2014–2015. Lithium-specific mining activities were conducted over at least five deposits in the Northern Complex, and four deposits in the Southern Complex.
In 2017, the Company purchased a DMS unit to produce a 6% Li2O spodumene concentrate. The Company has completed ground reconnaissance, satellite image interpretation, geological mapping, channel and chip sampling, trenching, core drilling, Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation, and a feasibility study. The Company initially focused on a geological assessment of available field data to prioritize the 200 known pegmatites that occur on the various properties for future evaluation. A ranking table that highlighted pegmatite volume, mineralogy and Li2O and Ta2O5 grade was established. Within the more prospective areas, the Company concentrated its activities on detailed geological and mineralogical mapping of historically mined pegmatites, in particular, on the larger pegmatites.
Geological Setting and Mineralization
The pegmatites in the Project area are classified as lithium–cesium–tantalum or LCT types. The Project area lies in the Eastern Brazilian Pegmatite Province that encompasses a very large region of about 150,000 km2, stretching from the state of Bahia to the state of Rio de Janeiro.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 31 |
The pegmatite swarm is associated with the Neoproterozoic Araçuaí orogeny and has been divided into two main types: anatectic (directly formed from the partial melting of the country rock) or residual pegmatite (fluid rich silicate melts resulting from the fractional crystallization of a parent magma). The pegmatites in the Project area are interpreted to be residual pegmatites and are further classified as LCT types.
Pegmatite bodies are typically hosted in a grey biotite–quartz schist and form bodies that are generally concordant with the schist foliation but can also cross-cut foliation. The dikes are sub-horizontal to shallow-dipping sheeted tabular bodies, typically ranging in thickness from a few metres up to 40 m or more, and display a discontinuous, thin, fine-grained chilled margin. Typical pegmatite mineralogy consists of microcline, quartz, spodumene, albite and muscovite. Spodumene typically comprises about 28–30% of the dike, microcline and albite around 30–35%, and white micas about 5–7%. Locally, feldspar and spodumenes crystals can reach as much as 10–20 cm in length. Tantalite, columbite and cassiterite can occur in association with albite and quartz. The primary lithium-bearing minerals are spodumene and petalite. Spodumene can theoretically contain as much as 3.73% Li, equivalent to 8.03% Li2O, whereas petalite, can contain as much as 2.09% lithium, equivalent to 4.50% Li2O.
Features of the pegmatites where mineral resources have been estimated include:
First Mine: foliation concordant, strikes northwest–southeast, dips to the southeast at 40º to 45º, and is not zoned. The strike length is 1,700 m, averages 12–13 m in thickness and has been drill tested to 259 m in depth. First Mine remains open to the west, east, and at depth
Second Mine: foliation discordant, strikes northeast–southwest, dips to the southeast at 30º to 35º, and is slightly zoned with a distinct spodumene zone as well as an albite zone. The pegmatite is about 600 m long (strike), 30–35 m wide, and 800 m along the dip direction. Second Mine remains open to the northeast and at depth
Murial: foliation discordant, strikes north–south, and has a variable westerly dip, ranging from 25º to 75º. The strike length is about 750 m, with a thickness of 15–20 m, and the down-dip dimension is 200 m. The pegmatite is zoned with a spodumene-rich intermediate zone and a central zone that contains both spodumene and petalite. The southern section of the pegmatite has lower lithium tenors than the norther portion of the dike. Murial remains open to the north, south, and at depth
Lavra do Meio: foliation concordant, strikes north–south, dips 75º–80º to the east. The strike length is 300 m with an average thickness of 12–15 m and a down-dip distance of 250 m. The pegmatite is zoned and contains both spodumene and petalite and remains open at depth.
Exploration
The Company began working on the Project in June 2012, focusing on a geological assessment of available field data to prioritize the 200 known pegmatites that occur on the various properties for future evaluation. A ranking table that highlighted pegmatite volume, mineralogy and Li2O and Ta2O5 grade was established.
Within the more prospective areas, the Company concentrated its activities on detailed geological and mineralogical mapping of historically mined pegmatites, in particular, on the larger pegmatites, First Mine and Second Mine. These dikes were channel sampled and subsequently assessed for their lithium, tantalum and cassiterite potential. This work was followed by bulk sampling and drilling. In the southern complex area, the Company’s geologists have visited sites of historical workings, and undertaken reconnaissance mapping and sampling activities. The Lavra Grande, Samambaia, Ananias, Lavra do Ramom and Lavra Antiga pegmatites were mined for spodumene and heavy minerals, and in some cases gem-quality crystals were targeted. These pegmatites are considered to warrant additional work.
Drilling
Drilling completed by the Company across the Project area consists of 255 core holes totalling 42,959.76 m. As at the date of the Updated Feasibility Study Report, this drilling has concentrated on the Grota do Cirilo pegmatites. Drilling was at HQ core size (63.5 mm core diameter) in order to recover enough material for metallurgical testing. Drill spacing is variable by pegmatite, but typically was at 50 m with wider spacing at the edges of the drill pattern. Drill orientations were tailored as practicable to the strike and dip of the individual pegmatites. The drill hole intercepts range in thickness from approximately 85–95% of true width to near true width of the mineralization.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 32 |
All core was photographed. Drill hole collars were picked up in the field using a Real Time Kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS) instrument with an average accuracy of 0.01 cm. All drill holes were down-hole surveyed by the Company’s personnel using the Reflex EZ-Track and Reflex Gyro instruments. Calibrations of tools were completed in 2017 and 2018.
Sampling intervals were determined by the geologist, marked and tagged based on lithology and mineralization observations. The typical sampling length was 1 m but varied according to lithological contacts between the mineralized pegmatite and the host rock. In general, 1-2 m host rock samples were collected from each side that contacts the pegmatite.
The Company conducted HQ drilling programs in 2014, 2017, and 2018 on selected pegmatite targets. The drill programs have used industry-standard protocols that include core logging, core photography, core recovery measurements, and collar and downhole survey measurements. There are no drilling, sampling or recovery factors that could materially impact the accuracy and reliability of the results in any of the drill campaigns. Drill results from Grota do Cirilo property support the Mineral Resource estimates and the feasibility study.
Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security
Sampling intervals were determined by the geologist, marked and tagged based on lithology and mineralization observations. The typical sampling length was 1 m but varied according to lithological contacts between the mineralized pegmatite and the host rock. In general, 1 m host rock samples were collected from each side that contacts the pegmatite.
All samples collected by Sigma Brazil during the course of the 2012–2018 exploration programs were sent to the SGS Geosol laboratory (SGS Geosol) located in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. A portion of the 2017–2018 sample pulps were prepared by ALS Brazil Ltda. in Vespasiano, Brazil (ALS Vespasiano) and shipped to ALS Canada Inc. Chemex Laboratory (ALS Chemex) in North Vancouver, BC, Canada for cross check validation. A portion of the 2014 samples were resampled by the QP and sent for validation to the SGS Lakefield Laboratory (SGS Lakefield) in Lakefield Canada. All laboratories, including ALS Chemex, ALS Vespasiano, SGS Lakefield and SGS Geosol are ISO/IEC 17025 accredited. The SGS Geosol laboratory is ISO 14001 and 17025 accredited by the Standards Council. All laboratories used for the technical report are independent from Sigma Brazil and the Company and provide services to Sigma Brazil pursuant to arm’s length service contracts.
Sample preparation conducted at SGS Geosol consisted of drying, crushing to 75% passing 3 mm using jaw crushers, and pulverizing to 95% passing 150 mesh (106 µm) using a ring and puck mill or a single component ring mill. In 2017, SGS Geosol performed 55-element analysis using sodium peroxide fusion followed by both inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) finish (SGS code ICM90A). This method uses 10 g of the pulp material and returns different detection limits for each element and includes a 10 ppm lower limit detection for Li and a 10,000 ppm upper limit detection for Li. In 2018, SGS Geosol used a 31-element analytical package using sodium peroxide fusion followed by both Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) and ICP-MS finish (SGS code ICP90A).
Sample preparation at ALS Vespasiano comprised drying, crushing to 70% passing 2 mm using jaw crushers, and pulverizing to 85% passing 200 mesh (75 µm) using a ring and puck mill or a single component ring mill. Lithium and boron were determined by sodium peroxide fusion followed by ICP-AES analysis (ALS Chemex method ME-ICP82b).
The 2017 witness samples collected on the 2014 drill core were analyzed at SGS Lakefield using sodium peroxide fusion followed by both ICP-OES and ICP-MS finish (SGS code ICM90A).
In addition to the laboratory quality assurance quality control (QA/QC) routinely implemented by SGS Geosol and ALS Chemex using pulp duplicate analysis, Sigma Brazil developed an internal QA/QC protocol for the First Mine drilling, which consisted of the insertion of analytical standard reference materials (standards), blanks and core duplicates on a systematic basis with the samples shipped to the analytical laboratories. In 2017, the Company also sent pulps from selected mineralized intersections to ALS Chemex for reanalysis. No pulp reanalysis was performed by the Company in 2013 and 2014. A total of 664 pulp samples from the 2017 First Mine drilling program were sent to ALS Vespasiano for third-party verification.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 33 |
Sigma Brazil inserted standards in sample batches during the 2014 and 2017–2018 sampling programs. During the 2014 campaign, the standard used was made of locally sourced and prepared pegmatite and was not certified. Sigma Brazil inserted an uncertified standard into the sample stream for every 25 samples for a total of five uncertified standards inserted. The 2017–2018 campaign used seven certified standards from African Mineral Standards (AMIS), an international supplier of certified reference materials. A total of 88 standards were inserted during the 2017 campaign and 315 were inserted during the 2018 campaign. Results were considered acceptable and no material accuracy issues were noted.
During the 2017–2018 campaign Sigma Brazil included insertion of analytical blanks in the sample series as part of their internal QA/QC protocol. The blank samples, which are made of fine silica powder provided by AMIS, are inserted an average of one for every 20 samples by the Sigma Brazil geologist and subsequently sent to SGS Geosol. The same procedure was used by Sigma Brazil for the 2014 drilling campaign. A total of 647 analytical blanks were analysed during the 2014 and 2017–2018 exploration programs. Results were considered acceptable and no material contamination issues were noted.
Sigma Brazil inserted core duplicates every 20th sample in the sample series as part of their internal QA/QC protocol. The sample duplicates correspond to a quarter HQ core from the sample left behind for reference, or a representative channel sample from the secondary channel cut parallel to the main channel. Assay results were considered acceptable between the two sample sets.
Bulk densities of the lithologies were measured by SGS Geosol by pycnometer measurement. Measurements were by lithology with special attention to the lithium bearing pegmatite. Separate measurements were made for the First Mine and Second Mine.
A total of 188 measurements were made on Xuxa core from 2017–2018. Of the 188 measurements, 24 were made on albite-altered pegmatite, 54 on schist, and 110 on lithium-bearing pegmatite. For Second Mine, a total of 401 measurements were made on core from the 2018 drill program. Of the 401 measurements, 82 were made on albite-altered pegmatite, 177 on schist, and 142 on lithium-bearing pegmatite. For Murial, a total of 134 measurements were made by the same method on core from the 2018 drill program. Of the 134 measurements, 32 were made on the albite-altered pegmatite, 58 on the schist and 44 on the lithium bearing pegmatite. For Lavra do Meio, a total of 51 measurement were made by the same method on core from the 2018 drill program. Of the 51 measurements, nine were made on the albite altered pegmatite, 22 on the schist and 20 on the lithium bearing pegmatite.
In 2017, SGS validated the exploration processes and core sampling procedures used by Sigma Brazil as part of an independent verification program. The QP concluded that the drill core handling, logging and sampling protocols are at conventional industry standard and conform to generally accept best practices. The chain of custody was followed by Sigma Brazil employees and the sample security procedure showed no flaws. The QP considers that the sample quality is good and that the samples are generally representative.
As additional QAQC, SMSA sent 664 samples from the 2017-2018 Grota do Cirillo drilling campaign to ALS Chemex for analysis using the protocol ME-ICP82b with sodium peroxide fusion. Preparation was done by ALS Vespasiano and the samples were subsequently shipped to Vancouver. The average Li concentration for the original was 6,411.4 ppm Li while the duplicate average was 6,475.9 ppm Li. This indicates a slight bias of the ALS Chemex duplicates which is well within the accepted margin of error.
Overall, the QP is confident that the system is appropriate for the collection of data suitable for a Mineral Resource estimate and can support Mineral Reserve estimates and mine planning.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 34 |
Data Verification
Visits to the Project site were conducted by Marc-Antoine Laporte, P.Geo., M.Sc. from September 11 to September 15, 2017, from July 11 to July 17, 2018 and from September 18 to 23, 2018. These visits enabled the QP to become familiar with the exploration methods used by Sigma Brazil, the field conditions, the position of the drill hole collars, the core storage and logging facilities and the different exploration targets.
The database for the Project was first transmitted to SGS by the Company on September 15, 2017 and was regularly updated by the Company’s geologists. The database contains data for: collar locations; downhole surveys; lithologies and lithium assays. Upon importation of the data into the modelling and mineral resources estimation software (Genesis©), SGS conducted a second phase of data validation where all the major discrepancies were removed from the database. Finally, SGS conducted random checks on approximately 5% of the assay certificates, to validate the assay values entered in the database.
Witness samples were taken from previously sampled intervals and the half cores were cut to quarter cores. A total of nine mineralized intervals were sampled to compare the average grade for the two different laboratories. The average for the original samples is 1.61 % Li2O while the average for the control samples is 1.59 % Li2O. The average grade difference is 0.02% which makes a relative difference of 1.28% between the original and the control samples.
Following the data verification process and QA/QC review, the QP is of the opinion that the sample preparation, analysis and QA/QC protocol used by Sigma Brazil for the Project follow generally accepted industry standards and that the Project data is of a sufficient quality. However, more attention should be put into the blank material selection in the future in order improve the similarity between the batches.
Mineral processing and Metallurgical Testing
Drill core samples from the First Mine were processed at the SGS Lakefield facility in October 2018, while samples from Barreiro were tested between November 2020 and May 2021. Work conducted on the Xuxa samples included comminution, heavy liquid separation (HLS), REFLUX™ classifier, DMS and magnetic separation, while the Barreiro test work program included sample characterization, grindability testing and heavy liquid separation (HLS).
First Mine
Drill core samples were selected and combined into six variability (Var) samples for a test work program comprising of mineralogical analyses, grindability, HLS, REFLUX™ classifier, DMS, and magnetic separation testing. Flowsheets for lithium beneficiation were developed in conjunction with the testwork. The goal was to produce spodumene concentrate grading a minimum 6% Li2O and maximum 1% Fe2O3 while maximizing lithium recovery.
Four HLS tests, at four crush sizes (15.9 mm, 12.5 mm, 9.5 mm, and 6.3 mm) were carried out on each of the six variability samples to evaluate the recovery. The 9.5 mm crush size was selected as the optimum crush size for DMS test work, as it results in the highest lithium recovery with minimal fines generation.
The DMS variability samples were each crushed to -9.5 mm and screened into four size fractions: coarse (-9.5/+6.3 mm), fines (-6.3/+1.7 mm), ultrafines (-1.7/+0.5 mm) and hypofines (-0.5 mm). The coarse, fines and ultrafines fractions of each variability sample were then processed separately for lithium beneficiation. The REFLUX™ classifier test work was carried out with a RC-100 unit for mica rejection from the fines and ultrafines fractions only. This test work was conducted at FLSmidth’s Minerals Testing and Research Center in Utah, USA.
The coarse and fines REFLUX™ classifier underflow and ultrafines RC underflow of each variability sample were processed separately through DMS. The DMS concentrate from each of these fractions underwent a magnetic separation step at 10,000 Gauss.
The DMS test work flowsheet for the coarse and fines fractions included two passes through the DMS; the first at a lower specific gravity (SG) cut-point (~2.65) to reject silicate gangue and the second at a higher specific gravity (SG) cut-point (~2.90) to generate spodumene concentrate. The coarse DMS middlings were re-crushed to -3.3 mm and a two stage HLS test conducted. The ultrafines DMS test work flowsheet included only a single pass through the DMS circuit at a high SG cut-point (~2.90) to generate spodumene concentrate.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 35 |
The DMS test results demonstrated that DMS was able to produce spodumene concentrate with >6% Li2O in most of the tests, for an average recovery of 60.4%.
The Var 3 and Var 4 samples were determined to best represent the deposit.
Second Mine
Four variability and one composite sample were tested for Second Mine, with the goals of the program to provide preliminary process information on the metallurgical performance of mineralized material samples from the Second Mine. The test work program was developed based on previous test work and flowsheet developed for the First Mine. The aim of the test work program was to produce chemical grade spodumene concentrate (>6% Li2O) with low iron content (<1% Fe2O3), while maximizing lithium recovery.
Two sets of HLS tests were undertaken. The first set was conducted using the Composite to test optimal crush size (i.e., top size of 15.9 mm, 12.5 mm, 10.0 mm, and 6.3 mm). HLS tests were then performed on each variability sample at the optimum crush size. The fine fraction (i.e., -0.5 mm) was screened out from each sub-sample and the oversize fraction was submitted for HLS testing. A crush size of -10 mm was determined to be optimal and variability HLS testing was undertaken at this crush size. Interpolated stage recoveries (6% Li2O concentrate) for the four variability samples ranged from 56.0% to 77.3%.
In all four variability samples, HLS tests produced >6% Li2O spodumene concentrate with low iron content (<1.0% Fe2O3).
Mineral resource estimates
Mineral Resources for the Grota do Cirilo pegmatite were estimated using a computerised resource block model. Three-dimensional wireframe solids of the mineralisation were defined using drill hole Li2O analytical data.
Data were composited to 1 m composite lengths, based on the north–south width of the block size defined for the resource block model. Compositing starts at the schist-pegmatite contact. No capping was applied on the analytical composite data. The First Mine models used a 6 m x 3 m x 5 m block size. Murial and Lavra do Meio models used a 5 m x 3 m x 5 m block size and the Second Mine model used a 5 m x 5 m x 5 m block. Average densities were applied to blocks, which varied by pegmatite, from 2.65 t/m3 at Lavra do Meio to 2.71 t/m3 at the Second Mine.
Variography was undertaken for First Mine, Second Mine and Lavra do Meio and the projection and Z-axis rescaling were done according to the mineralization orientation.
The grade interpolation for the First Mine, Second Mine and Lavra do Meio resource block models were completed using ordinary kriging (OK). The Murial model was estimated using an inverse distance weighting to the second power (ID2) methodology. The interpolation process was conducted using three successive passes with more inclusive search conditions from the first pass to the next until most blocks were interpolated, as follows:
Pass 1:
First Mine: search ellipsoid distance of 75 m (long axis) by 75 m (intermediate axis) and 25 m (short axis) with an orientation of 130° azimuth and -50° dip to the southeast; minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Second Mine: search ellipsoid distance of 55 m (long axis) by 55 m (intermediate axis) and 25 m (short axis) with an orientation of 155° azimuth and -35° dip to the southeast; a minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Murial: 75 m (long axis) by 75 m (intermediate axis) and 35 m (short axis) with an orientation of 95° azimuth and -80° dip to the west; minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Lavra do Meio: 50 m (long axis) by 50 m (intermediate axis) and 25 m (short axis) with an orientation of 280° azimuth and -75° dip to the east; minimum of five composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 36 |
Pass 2:
First Mine: twice the search distance of the first pass; minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Second Mine: twice the search distance of the first pass; a minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Murial: twice the search distance of the first pass; minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Lavra do Meio: twice the search distance of the first pass; minimum of five composites, a maximum of 15 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Pass 3:
First Mine: 300 m (long axis) by 300 m (intermediate axis) by 100 m (short axis) with a minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 25 composites and a minimum of three drill holes
Second Mine: 250 m (long axis) by 250 m (intermediate axis) by 100 m (short axis) with a minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 25 composites and no minimum number of drill holes
Murial: 200 m (long axis) by 200 m (intermediate axis) by 100 m (short axis) with a minimum of seven composites, a maximum of 20 composites and no minimum number of drill holes
Lavra do Meio: 125 m (long axis) by 125 m (intermediate axis) by 75 m (short axis) with a minimum of five composites, a maximum of 15 composites and no minimum composites required per drill hole.
The estimates and models were validated by statistically comparing block model grades to the assay and composite grades, and by comparing block values to the composite values located inside the interpolated blocks. The estimates were considered reasonable.
Mineral Resources are classified into Measured, Indicated and Inferred categories. The Mineral Resource classification is based on the density of analytical information, the grade variability and spatial continuity of mineralization. The Mineral Resources were classified in two successive stages: automated classification, followed by manual editing of final classification results. Classifications were based on the following:
Measured Mineral Resources
First Mine: the search ellipsoid used was 50 m (strike) by 50 m (dip) by 25 m with a minimum of seven composites in at least three different drill holes
Second Mine, Murial, and Lavra do Meio: the search ellipsoid was 55 m (strike) by 55 m (dip) by 35 m with a minimum of five composites in at least three different drill holes
Indicated Mineral Resources
In all deposits, the search ellipsoid was twice the size of the Measured category ellipsoid using the same composites selection criteria
Inferred Mineral Resources
In all deposits, all remaining blocks.
The conceptual economic parameters were used to assess reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction. A series of economic parameters were estimated to represent the production cost and economic prospectivity of an open pit mining operation in Brazil and came either from SGS Canada or Sigma Brazil. These parameters are believed to be sufficient to include all block models in future open pit mine planning, due mostly to the relatively low mining costs in Brazil.
The Mineral Resource estimates for Grota do Cirilo are reported in Table 0-1 to Table 0-4 using a 0.5% Li2O cut-off. The Mineral Resource estimates are constrained by the topography and are based on the conceptual economic parameters. The estimate has an effective date of January 10, 2019. The QP for the estimate is Mr. Marc-Antoine Laporte, P.Geo., an SGS employee.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 37 |
Table 0-1 – First Mine Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
Cut-off
Grade Li2O (%) |
Category | Tonnage (t) |
Average
Grade Li2O (%) |
0.5 | Measured | 10,193,000 | 1.59 |
0.5 | Indicated | 7,221,000 | 1.49 |
0.5 | Measured + Indicated | 17,414,000 | 1.55 |
0.5 | Inferred | 3,802,000 | 1.58 |
Notes to accompany Table 0-1 First Mine Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate:
1. | Mineral Resources have an effective date of January 10, 2019 and have been classified using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Marc-Antoine Laporte, P.Geo., an SGS employee. |
2. | Mineral Resources are reported assuming open pit mining methods, and the following assumptions: lithium concentrate (6% Li2O) price of US$1,000/t, mining costs of US$2/t for mineralization and waste, US$1.2/t for overburden, crushing and processing costs of US$12/t, general and administrative (G&A) costs of US$4/t, concentrate recovery of 85%, 2% royalty payment, pit slope angles of 55º, and an overall cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O. |
3. | Tonnages and grades have been rounded in accordance with reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding. |
4. | Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of those Mineral Resources converted to Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
5. | Long-term lithium concentrate price of $1,000/t assumes processing cost of US$12/t and metallurgical recovery of 85%. |
Table 0-2 – Second Mine Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
Cut-off
Grade Li2O (%) |
Category | Tonnage (t) |
Average
Grade Li2O (%) |
0.5 | Measured | 10,313,000 | 1.4 |
0.5 | Indicated | 10,172,000 | 1.46 |
0.5 | Measured + Indicated | 20,485,000 | 1.43 |
0.5 | Inferred | 1,909,000 | 1.44 |
Notes to accompany Table 0-2 Second Mine Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
1. | Mineral Resources have an effective date of January 10, 2019 and have been classified using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Marc-Antoine Laporte, P.Geo., an SGS employee. |
2. | Mineral Resources are reported assuming open pit mining methods, and the following assumptions: lithium concentrate (6% Li2O) price of US$1,000/t, mining costs of US$2/t for mineralization and waste, US$1.2/t for overburden, crushing and processing costs of US$12/t, general and administrative (G&A) costs of US$4/t, concentrate recovery of 85%, 2% royalty payment, pit slope angles of 55º, and an overall cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O. |
3. | Tonnages and grades have been rounded in accordance with reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding. |
4. | Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
5. | Long-term lithium concentrate price of $1,000/t assumes processing cost of US$12/t and metallurgical recovery of 85%. |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 38 |
Table 0-3 – Murial Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
Cut-off
Grade Li2O (%) |
Category | Tonnage (t) |
Average
Grade Li2O (%) |
0.5 | Measured | 4,175,000 | 1.17 |
0.5 | Indicated | 1,389,000 | 1.04 |
0.5 | Measured + Indicated | 5,564,000 | 1.14 |
0.5 | Inferred | 669,000 | 1.06 |
Notes to accompany Table 0-3 Murial Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
1. | Mineral Resources have an effective date of January 10, 2019 and have been classified using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Marc-Antoine Laporte, P.Geo., an SGS employee. |
2. | Mineral Resources are reported assuming open pit mining methods, and the following assumptions: lithium concentrate (6% Li2O) price of US$1,000/t, mining costs of US$2/t for mineralization and waste, US$1.2/t for overburden, crushing and processing costs of US$12/t, general and administrative (G&A) costs of US$4/t, concentrate recovery of 85%, 2% royalty payment, pit slope angles of 55º, and an overall cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O. |
3. | Tonnages and grades have been rounded in accordance with reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding. |
4. | Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability |
5. | Long-term lithium concentrate price of $1,000/t assumes processing cost of US$12/t and metallurgical recovery of 85%. |
Table 0-4 – Lavra do Meio Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
Cut-off
Grade Li2O (%) |
Category | Tonnage (t) |
Average
Grade Li2O (%) |
0.5 | Measured | 1,626,000 | 1.16 |
0.5 | Indicated | 649,000 | 0.93 |
0.5 | Measured + Indicated | 2,275,000 | 1.09 |
0.5 | Inferred | 261,000 | 0.87 |
Notes to accompany Table 0-4 Lavra do Meio Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
1. | Mineral Resources have an effective date of January 10, 2019 and have been classified using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Marc-Antoine Laporte, P.Geo., an SGS employee. |
2. | Mineral Resources are reported assuming open pit mining methods, and the following assumptions: lithium concentrate (6% Li2O) price of US$1,000/t, mining costs of US$2/t for mineralization and waste, US$1.2/t for overburden, crushing and processing costs of US$12/t, general and administrative (G&A) costs of US$4/t, concentrate recovery of 85%, 2% royalty payment, pit slope angles of 55º, and an overall cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O. |
3. | Tonnages and grades have been rounded in accordance with reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding. |
4. | Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
5. | Long-term lithium concentrate price of $1,000/t assumes processing cost of US$12/t and metallurgical recovery of 85%. |
Factors that can affect Grota do Cirilo Mineral Resource estimates include but are not limited to:
· | Changes to the modelling method or approach |
· | Changes to geotechnical assumptions, in particular, the pit slope angles |
· | Metallurgical recovery assumption that are based on preliminary test results |
· | Changes to any of the social, political, economic, permitting, and environmental assumptions considered when evaluating reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 39 |
Mineral Resource estimates can also be affected by the market value of lithium and lithium compounds.
Mineral Reserve Estimates
First Mine Mineral Reserve estimates have an effective date of 5 June 2019 and have been converted from Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. The key parameters upon which the 5 June 2019 Mineral Reserve estimates were defined are summarized in Table 0-5.
Table 0-5 – Parameters Used in First Mine Pit Optimization
Parameter | Value |
Lithium concentrate price | US$700/t concentrate |
Royalties (CFEM) | 2% of revenue |
Exchange rate | 3.7 BRL/ US$ |
Costs | |
Mining | US$2.15/t mined |
Processing | US$10.51 /t ore |
G&A | US$3,809,106/ year |
Logistics | US$82/t concentrate wet |
Plant recovery | 60.4% |
Concentrate grade | 6% |
Mining recovery | 100% |
Dilution | 9.3% |
Overall Pit slopes | 33.6° – 53° |
Note: CFEM is the Brazilian government royalty
The total Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves are as presented in Table 0-6.
Table 0-6 – First Mine Mineral Reserves
Reserve | Tonnage (t) | Li₂O (%) |
Proven | 10,270,000 | 1.45 |
Probable | 3,520,000 | 1.47 |
TOTAL | 13,790,000 | 1.46 |
Note to accompany Mineral Reserves table:
1. | Mineral Reserves have an effective date of 5 June 2019. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez, FAIG, an employee of GE21. |
2. | Mineral Reserves are confined within an optimized pit shell that uses the following parameters: lithium concentrate price: US$700/t concentrate; mining costs: US$2.15/t mined; processing costs: US$10.51/t processed; general and administrative costs: US$3.8 M/a; logistics costs: US$82/t wet concentrate; process recovery of 60.4%; mining dilution of 9%; pit inter-ramp angles that range from 40.5 – 74.8º. |
3. | Tonnages and grades have been rounded in accordance with reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding. |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 40 |
The existing high voltage transmission line at Pit 1 will need to be relocated in Year 2 so as not to interfere with the mining of the pit’s northern part. The Company has been given the legal authority to relocate the line by 150 m.
The Company has not purchased the surface rights for Pit 2 but has applied to the ANM (Brazilian mining regulatory agency) for the granting of authority to mine the area. Pit 2 will come into operation 1.5 years after plant start-up.
Mining methods
First Mine
The Company has undertaken a program of resource drilling for the First Mine deposit. Most of these drill holes have been geotechnically logged for structural data. The geotechnical data logged from these holes has been analyzed to provide estimates of slope stability, using industry standard empirical techniques.
The mine layout and operation are based on the following criteria:
Two independent open pits areas: Pit 1 in the north and Pit 2 in the south
Single access from both pits to the mine infrastructure pad and the processing plant
Low height ore benches to reduce mine dilution and maximize mine recovery
Pre-splitting of the ore zone to reduce mine dilution
Elevated inter-ramp angles for the waste to reduce strip ratio.
The basis for the scheduling includes:
Six months of pre-stripping to liberate the ore
Mining of Pit 1 first as this is closer to the processing plant and is also included in the current environmental license process
Disposal of the waste rock at the start of operation at pile 1 (close to processing plant) and pile 2
Commence disposal of waste rock at pile 3 after one year and three months from the start of the operation
Commence mining of Pit 2 from Year 3 onwards
Mine both pits in conjunction from Year 3 to Year 6 to reduce the drop-down rate and to facilitate the 1.5 Mtpa production rate
The planned open pit mine life is nine years and three months
The mining fleet is based on off-highway trucks for the waste movement and road trucks for the ore to be operated by a mining contractor.
Second Mine
GE21, based on the Mineral Resource, prepared the PEA for the Second Mine.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
It is noted that the Company has not yet made a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. The Company expects that it will assess the results of a pre-feasibility study and a definitive feasibility study before making a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. All statements regarding mine development or production in respect of the Second Mine in this AIF are expressly qualified by this statement.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 41 |
The mine layout and operation are based on the following criteria:
· | A single open pit on the Second Mine pegmatite |
· | Low height mineralized material benches to reduce mine dilution and maximize mine recovery |
· | Pre-splitting of the mineralized material to reduce mine dilution |
· | Elevated inter-ramp angles for the waste to reduce strip ratio |
The basis for the scheduling includes:
· | Pre-stripping the pit to liberate mineralized material |
· | Pit cut-backs in years 5 and 6 to expand and deepen pit |
· | Mining at a rate of 1.68 Mtpa |
· | The planned open pit mine life is 12 years and eight months |
· | The mining fleet is based on off-highway trucks for the waste movement and road trucks for the mineralized material to be operated by a mining contractor |
Recovery methods
The First Mine concentrator plant is designed to produce a minimum 6.0% Li2O spodumene concentrate from an ore grade of 1.46% Li2O (diluted) with an average iron content of 0.97%, using DMS.
If a positive production decision is made for the Second Mine, a second DMS concentrator plant would be constructed to process the Second Mine mineralized material. This plant would produce a minimum 6.0% Li2O spodumene concentrate from a mineralized material grade of 1.44% Li2O (diluted) with an average iron content of 0.97%.
Processing Plant Description
The First Mine plant throughput capacity is based on 1.5 Mtpa (dry) of ore fed to the crushing circuit. The in-house crushing circuit is sized for 3.0 Mtpa, which will accommodate the additional mineralized material from Second Mine, if developed. The First Mine wet plant (DMS) is sized for 1.5 Mtpa throughput capacity, while the possible Second Mine DMS is based on a 1.68 Mtpa throughput capacity.
The concentrator plants are designed based on a proven DMS circuit and include three-stage conventional crushing and screen circuit, up-flow classification for mica removal, two-stage coarse DMS circuit, two-stage fines DMS circuit, single-stage ultrafines circuit, as well as magnetic separation and optical sorting on the final product stream.
Design Criteria and Utilities Requirements
The data for the feasibility study engineering and design were sourced from metallurgical test-work conducted at SGS Lakefield. Recovery data are based on results from variability samples #3 and #4. The mass balance, process design criteria and process flow diagrams were developed based on these test work data.
The utilities consumption requirements are approximately 6.7 MW for the process plant and 1.5 MW for non-process infrastructure at the process plant.
The raw water consumption for process water is nominal at 23 m3/hr (make-up raw water requirement).
The process water will be recycled within the plant using a thickener, where all fines slurry streams will be directed and recovered. This water will be pumped to the process water tank and recycled to the circuits.
Consumables will include reagents and operational consumables for the crushing circuit and the DMS plant.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 42 |
Project Infrastructure
The First Mine project infrastructure will be constructed on earthworks pads for the mineral processing plant, the mine operation support units, the open pits of the mines and the areas of waste rock and tailings disposal.
If developed, the Second Mine will utilize the infrastructure developed for the First Mine.
Buildings, Roads, Fuel Storage, Power Supply and Water Supply
Access to the processing plant will be by municipal road linking BR367 within the communities of Poço D’antas and Taquaril Seco. The current road will be suitable for truck traffic; however, construction of a new section of the road will be necessary to bypass the plant.
The plant and mine services areas will have administrative buildings such as offices, changeroom, cafeteria, concierge, clinic, fire emergency services and operation support facilities such as workshops and warehouses.
Fuel will be stored and dispensed from a fuel facility located at the mine services area.
Power will be supplied from the existing power grid line. Two main sub-stations (CEMIG and plant) will be installed to supply power to the plant, the mine services area and associated infrastructure.
Raw water will be supplied from the Jequitinhonha River, treated as necessary and reticulated within the plant for process, potable and firewater needs.
Waste Rock and Tailings Disposal and Stockpiles
At the First Mine, waste rock and tailings will be stored in two piles in the initial years of operation. Waste pile 1 will be located near the process area (both in the Olimpio area) and will be used for co-disposal of waste rock and tailings generated from the plant.
Waste pile 2 will be located to the south, in the Gilson area.
Both piles will have 25m wide access ramps with maximum gradients of 10%.
Waste piles 3 and 4 will be located adjacent to the north and south pits respectively. Table 0-7 provides the projected storage requirements.
Table 0-7 – Waste Pile Storage
Waste Rock m3 | Tailings m3 | Waste &
Tailings Total MT | Years
- Storage | |||||||||||
Waste pile #1 | 7,845,000 | 567,400 | 17 (Note 1) | 1.3 | ||||||||||
Waste pile #2 | 456,731 (Note 2) | 39,879 | 1.0 | 1.3 | ||||||||||
Waste pile #3 | 17,399,267 | 8,582,001 | 88.26 | 4.5 | ||||||||||
Waste pile #4 | 26,776,556 | - | 101.14 | 5.2 |
Note 1: approximately 6.0 Mt of mine pre-stripping (first 2 quarters of mine production) will be disposed of at waste pile 1
Note 2: 314,072 m3 will be clear and grub from the process area and mine services area and 142,659 m3 from the earthworks cut material.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 43 |
Control Systems and Communication
A process control system (PCS) including a main plant SCADA system will be installed for monitoring and control purposes.
The telecommunications network will consist of the telecommunications network, access control system and RFID.
Market Studies and Contracts
The key information contained in the market study was prepared by Roskill Consulting Group Ltd (Roskill).
Demand and Consumption
The short-, medium- and long-term outlook for lithium consumption appears strong, with overall consumption growth forecast at 15.2% per annum, and demand growth 14.5% per annum, to 2033 in the base-case scenario. Growth will be higher in the shorter-term, at 22.7% per annum to 2023, and then slow to 14.0% per annum from 2023 to 2028, and 9% per annum from 2028 to 2033, as the market matures.
There are, however, considerable upside and downside risks to the outlook for growth in consumption of lithium to 2028, dependant on the global economic growth and the demand of Li-ion battery-powered hybrid and electric vehicles (xEVs).
Supply
At end-2018, global nameplate production capacity for mining lithium totalled 588,540 tpa lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE). Based on announced capacity expansions and new project schedules, lithium mine production capacity is forecast to increase to almost 1.0 Mtpa LCE by 2022. The largest additions to mine capacity are in Australia for mineral-based production and Chile for brine-based production. Additional mine capacity will be required from the mid/late-2020s.
Contracts
The Company has entered into the Mitsui HOA for a strategic offtake and funding partnership with Mitsui for a significant portion of the funding required for the capital expenditures and project construction.
Pursuant to Mitsui HOA, Mitsui and the Company have agreed terms on:
· | Production pre-payment to the Company of US$30,000,000 for battery-grade lithium concentrate supply of up to 55,000 t annually over six years, extendable for five years plus an off-take agreement supplementary 25,000 t of product annually |
· | Advancement of deposit for long-lead items for the project |
· | Strategic collaboration to leverage Mitsui’s considerable global logistics and battery materials marketing expertise as well as an agreement to continue discussions regarding additional funding for further exploration and development of the Company’s mineral properties |
· | Mitsui’s right to participate in the Company’s future capital for production expansion with other deposits conditional to concluding a feasibility study and Mineral Reserves estimates |
· | Sales prices are set quarterly based on the published price of nominal arms-length chemical-spodumene concentrate above 6% Li2O (SC6). |
For more information in respect of additional contracts entered into after the date of the Updated Feasibility Study Report, see “General Development of the Business – Three Year History - Corporate”.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 44 |
The Company has no contracts in place in support of operations. Any future contracts are likely to be negotiated and renewed on an annual or biannual basis. Contract terms are expected to be typical of similar contracts in Minas Gerais State.
Price Forecast
The Company is using the 10-year Roskill forecast for the average spodumene concentrate nominal arms-length sales price of US$750 US (cost, insurance and freight (CIF) delivered to Port of Shanghai, China) in the economic assessment.
Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
Conselho Estadual de Politica Ambiental (COPAM) granted an Operation License in support of certain Sigma Brazil mining concessions on the Grota do Cirilo property on August 25, 1994. The licence was renewed on August 14, 2008 but has subsequently been allowed to lapse as it was not suitable for the new level of mining contemplated by the Company. The Company applied and was issued the first phase of the Preliminary License (Licença Previa or LP) and an Installation License (Licença de Instalação or LI) to commence construction at the First Mine. Mining licenses are for life of mine and environmental licences are timely renewed when due.
The Company holds approved economic mining plans (Plano de Aproveitamento Econômico or PAE) over the Xuxa, Barreiro, Lavra do Meio, Murial, and Maxixe deposits within the Grota do Cirilo property. The PAE for the First Mine was updated and approved in August 2018.
Reclamation plans (referred to as degraded area plans or PRADs) have been developed and implemented for certain past-producing areas within the Grota do Cirilo property. The successful recovery of these areas is managed by Sigma Brazil personnel and external consultants in conjunction with the governing regulatory agencies.
The Company has held regular meetings and consultation sessions with local stakeholders regularly over the last five years. The further development of Sigma Brazil mining activities in the Jequitinhonha Valley is viewed by both communities as an important regional economic driver.
Applicable Legal Requirements for Project Environmental Permitting
CONAMA Resolution N° 237 (1997) defines environmental licensing as an administrative procedure by which the competent environmental agency permits the locating, installation, expansion and operation of enterprises and activities that use environmental resources in a manner considered to be effectively or potentially polluting.
The licensing process in Minas Gerais has been developed in accordance with COPAM Regulatory Deliberation N° 217, dated December 6, 2017 and establishes classification criteria based on scale and polluting potential, as well as the locational criteria used to define the modalities of environmental licensing of ventures and activities that use environmental resources in the state of Minas Gerais.
In compliance with CONAMA Resolution 09/90, the environmental licensing of mining projects is always subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (”EIA”), followed by an Environmental Impact Report (”RIMA”), which supports the technical and environmental feasibility stage of the project and the granting of a LP and/or a concurrent LP + LI.
Current Project Environmental Permitting Status
A Concurrent Environmental Licensing Type CEL 2 (LP + LI) will be required in support of operations.
The water license for the uptake of 150 m³/h of water from the Jequitinhonha River was approved by the Agencia Nacional das Águas (ANA) in February 2019.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 45 |
The CEL 2 (LP + LI) for the initial project phase, consisting of the north pit (Pit #1), waste piles 1 and 2 and the plant area was submitted on December 20, 2018 and was followed by the complete presentation of the EIS, the EIR and the Environmental Control Plan (ECP) as well the other documents listed in Basic Guidance Form (BGF). The EIS (Estudo e Relatorio de Impacto Ambiental – EIA-RIMA dated 30 October 2018) and Plano de Controle Ambiental – PCA dated December 2018 were prepared and issued for submittal to the authorities by NEO Soluções Ambientais and ATTO GEO Geologia e Engenharia. Approval was obtained on June 3, 2019.
A second EIS covering Pit #2 and waste piles #3 and #4 was formally submitted for approval in March 2020 in line with the prescribed permitting timing requirements. for the process plant coming online with Pit #1.
Authorizations
Sigma Brazil is the owner of the mining rights registered under DNPM Nº 824.692/1971, and the holder of Mining Concession Ordinance Nº 1.366, published on October 19, 1984. In 2018 a new Economic Development Plan (EDP) was registered with the National Mining Agency (ANM), which was approved on November 16, 2018.
The approval of the EDP and environmental study involves the technical and legal analysis and formal approval of the proposed project. With the granted LP + LI, the company must now install the project within 5 years, comply with the environmental conditions established in the LP + LI certificate and finally, apply for the Operation License after installation in order to begin operational activities.
The formalization of the environmental licensing process also included requesting and granting of the EIA. This allows for environmental intervention in an approximately 64 ha area.
Land Access
The Company has a lease agreement with Miazga Participações S.A., owner of the Poço Danta-Paiuí, Poço Danta and Poço Dantas Farms, to carry out mining activities on its properties. These farms include Legal Reserves (LR) which are preserved and registered in the National Rural Environmental Registration System (NRERS), in accordance with Law Nº 12.651, dated May 25, 2012.
Social License Considerations
The Company understands and accepts the importance of proactive community relations as an overriding principle in its day-to-day operations as well as future development planning. The company therefore structures its community relations activities to consider the concerns of the local people and endeavors to communicate and demonstrate its commitment in terms that can be best appreciated and understood to maintain the social license to operate.
The Jequitinhonha Valley is the poorest region in Minas Gerais which is plighted by poverty and is in the lowest quartile of the Human Development Index (HDI). The Company is the largest investment and operation in the area by a factor of ten and the project will be transformational to the local communities. The largest direct economic benefit is that the Company is subject to a 2% royalty on revenue which is divided between the Federal Government, State Government and Local Government. Secondly a portion of the taxes on local procurement of goods and services is shared with the Local Government. These incomes from the royalty and tax are a most important source of funding for local Government and the Company is the largest direct contributor in the region. The Company will be by far the largest employer in the region with an estimated 500 direct jobs being created with 3 to 4 times this number being indirect.
Farming in the area is small-scale subsistence type as the area is semi-arid. There is minimal impact on the neighbouring farms of Grota do Cirilo properties. The Company and contractor workforce will live in the cities of Araçuaí and Itinga and strict environmental management plans are in place to minimize the environmental footprint of the project. An example is 90% of the process water is re-circulated and there is zero run-off water from the site except during the wet season, when excess water from the pond will be discharged in an overflow channel. The process uses dry stacking technology and no slimes dam will be built. Regular environmental monitoring will be conducted, and results will be shared with the local communities.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 46 |
The Company has targeted and continues with consultations/engagements with numerous stakeholders in support of project development of the Project and has hosted visits from representatives of government departments and local academic institutions.
Rehabilitation, Closure Planning and Post-Closure Monitoring
The closure plan for the Grota do Cirilo property encompasses the following: dismantling of building and infrastructure, removal of heavy mobile and surface equipment, restoration by reconstituting vegetal cover of the soil and the establishment of the native vegetation, grading and capping with vegetation suppression layer and revegetation of the waste rock and overburden stockpiles, removal of suppressed vegetation along with slope cover and surface drainage for water management, fencing of site, environmental liability assessment studies where there may have been spillages and soil and water contamination and safe disposal, revegetation of the open pit berm areas and fencing around the open pits.
In the post-closure phase, a socioenvironmental and geotechnical monitoring program will be carried out, to support ecosystem restoration or preparation for the proposed future use.
The monitoring program will collect soil and diversity of species on an annual basis, continuing for a five-year period after mine closure.
Second Mine Environmental Work to Date
The Environmental Impact Study - EIA and its respective Environmental Impact Report - RIMA will be submitted to the regulatory agency, Bureau of Priority Projects - SUPPRI, as a supporting document to obtain a Preliminary License - LP and an Installation License - LI for Grota do Cirilo Project - Second Mine Pegmatite.
Considering the parameters defined by the current laws and regulations, CONAMA Resolution 09/90, the environmental licensing of mining projects is conditioned to EIA/RIMA submission, and these studies are the main technical resources to assess project feasibility.
The environmental licensing process started in October 2020 and will be formalized with the submission of the technical studies requested through the Environmental Licensing System - SLA, request No.: 2020.10.01.003.0003780 for the production of: 1,500,000 t/year for open pit mining and 251.89 ha for waste heaps.
Capital and Operating Costs
Capital Costs First Mine
The Production Phase 1 capital cost (CAPEX) estimate includes the process plant, site infrastructure, mining and Owner’s costs. Pre-production, working capital, sustaining and deferred capital costs were also included.
Equipment costs were obtained with firm price quotations for six long lead mechanical equipment and with budgetary quotations for the remaining equipment packages. In-country (Brazil) quotations were obtained for the installation unit rates and to the extent feasible for equipment supply. Brazilian fabricators were selected for structural steel and platework supply and fabrication.
Material take-offs (MTOs) were generated from the feasibility study designs with the unit rate costs applied per commodity. The CAPEX estimate has an accuracy of ±15% and is summarized in Table 0-8.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 47 |
Table 0-8 – Capital Cost Estimate Summary First Mine
Description | Capital
Cost US$ (Million) | |||
Processing plant | 32.8 | |||
Site infrastructure | 32.2 | |||
Owner’s cost | 4.6 | |||
Contingency | 7.5 | |||
Recoverable taxes | -6.0 | |||
SUBTOTAL CAPITAL COST | 71.1 | |||
Pre-production and working capital | 27.3 | |||
Sustaining and deferred capital | 15.2 |
Operating Costs First Mine
The Production Phase 1 operating cost (OPEX) estimate is based on contract mining, build-own-operate (BOO) high-voltage electrical sub-stations and non-process infrastructure substations and contract crushing, as per the Company’s preferred commercial strategy.
The concentrate transport cost has been estimated to be US$22.90M per annum or US$15.30/t of ore per the Company input based on preliminary quotations. This includes all the transport costs from the site to the Port of Ilhéus, Brazil, port storage and handling fees and CIF shipment to the port of Shanghai, China.
General and administration costs have been estimated to be US$2.64M per annum or US$1.76/t of ore.
Operating cost estimates are summarized in Table 0-9.
Table 0-9 – Operating Cost Estimate Summary First Mine
Description | OPEX
US$/t | |||
Mining cost per tonne of ore mined | 21.91 | |||
Process cost per tonne of ROM | 10.69 | |||
G&A cost per tonne of ROM | 1.76 | |||
Shipping per tonne of ROM | 15.30 | |||
NPI (included in Process and G&A) | - | |||
TOTAL | 49.66 |
The OPEX costs are inclusive of taxes. The OPEX accuracy is ± 15%.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 48 |
Plant CAPEX and OPEX Second Mine
GE21, based on the Mineral Resource, prepared the PEA for the Second Mine.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
The Production Phase 2 plant and infrastructure CAPEX is estimated at US$38.0 million.
The Production Phase 2 plant and infrastructure OPEX is as per operating costs estimated for the First Mine.
Mining Capital Costs Second Mine
GE21, based on the Mineral Resource, prepared the PEA for the Second Mine.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
Total Production Phase 2 pre-production capex were estimated at about US$1.62 million.
Table 0-10 – CAPEX Summary Second Mine
Description | Investment (USDx1.000) | |||||
Mining Equipment | NA (contractor fleet) | |||||
Owner’s Cost | 1,252.9 | |||||
Sub-total 1 | 1,252.9 | |||||
Contingency | 30% | 375.9 | ||||
TOTAL CAPEX | 1,623.6 |
Mining Operating Costs Second Mine
GE21, based on the Mineral Resource, prepared the PEA for the Second Mine.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
The Production Phase 2 mining operating costs were based on the estimated operating costs for the neighbouring First Mine which is currently in a detailed engineering stage of development and construction. Table 0-11 shows the summary OPEX costs and assumptions.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 49 |
Table 0-11: OPEX Summary Second Mine
description | total | |||
Total Operating Cost LOM $US M | 605.82 | |||
Total Mined Mt | 263.04 | |||
Operating Cost $US/t | 2.30 |
Economic Analysis
Production Phase 1
The Production Phase 1 economic analysis was developed using the discounted cash flow method and based on the data and assumptions for capital and operating costs detailed in this report for the First Mine project mining, processing and associated infrastructure. An exchange rate of 3.85 BRL per US$ was used to convert particular components of the cost estimates into US$. No provision was made for the effects of inflation and the base currency was considered on a constant 2019 US$ basis. The evaluation was undertaken on a 100% equity basis. Exploration costs are deemed outside of the project and any additional project study costs have not been included in the analysis.
Production Phase 1 base case scenario results are presented in Table 0-12.
Table 0-12 – Base Case Economic Analysis Results First Mine
Item | Unit | Value | ||||
Pre-tax NPV @ 8% | US$ | 299,074,000 | ||||
After-tax NPV @ 8% | US$ | 248,507,000 | ||||
Pre-tax IRR | % | 47.6 | ||||
After-tax IRR | % | 43.2 | ||||
Pre-tax payback period | Years | 2.9 | ||||
After-tax payback period | Years | 3.1 |
Note: NPV = net present value, IRR = internal rate of return.
The main economic assumptions/input parameters used for the base case are shown in Table 0-13.
Table 0-13 – Main Macroeconomic Assumptions First Mine
Item | Unit | Value | ||||
Spodumene price @ 6.00% Li2O (CIF China) (Note 1) | US$/t | 733 | ||||
Spodumene price @ 6.00% Li2O (FOB Ilhéus Port) (Note 2) | US$/t | 629 | ||||
Exchange rate (Note 3) | BRL/US$ | 3.85 | ||||
Discount rate | % | 8.0 |
Note 1: Roskill forecast of average nominal arms-length selling price
Note 2: China spodumene price minus budgetary estimate shipping cost.
Note 3: An exchange rate of 4.10 BRL/US$ was used for update of the CAPEX. OPEX was based on 3.85 BRL/US$.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 50 |
The main technical assumptions for the base case are shown in Table 0-14.
Table 0-14 – Technical Assumptions (base case) First Mine
Item | Unit | Value | ||||
Total Mineral Reserves (P&P) | t | 13,784,000 | ||||
Annual ROM ore processed | t | 1,496,000 | ||||
Annual Spodumene Concentrate Production | t | 220,000 | ||||
Lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) production (Note 1) | t | 33,000 | ||||
Strip ratio | ratio | 9.6: 1 | ||||
Average Li2O grade of the Mineral Reserve | % | 1.46 | ||||
Spodumene recovery rate | % | 60.4 | ||||
Concentrate grade | % Li2O | 6.00 | ||||
Mine life | years | 9.25 | ||||
Cost of spodumene concentrate ex-works | US$/t | 238 | ||||
Transportation costs (CIF China) | US$/t | 104 | ||||
Total cash cost (CIF China) | US$/t | 342 | ||||
Processing costs per tonne ROM | US$/t | 11.03 | ||||
Mining costs per waste + ore mined | US$/t mined | 2.07 |
Note 1: tonnage based on direct conversion to LCE excluding conversion rate
In the analysis, a 10-year average Roskill forecast of an average nominal arms-length selling price of US$733 (CIF Shanghai) for the spodumene concentrate has been assumed.
Figure 0-1 illustrates the after-tax cash flow and cumulative cash flow profiles of the project under the base case scenario.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 51 |
Figure 0-1 – After-Tax Cash Flow and Cumulative Cash Flow First Mine
The First Mine project has been evaluated on pre- and after-tax basis.
Sudene is a government agency tasked with simulating economic development in specific geographies of Brazil. The project will be installed in a Sudene-covered area, where a tax incentive granted to the project indicates a 75% reduction of income tax for 10 years, after achieving at least 20% of its production capacity. The considered Brazilian income tax rate is assumed to be 15.25%, which represents the Sudene tax benefit applied to the Brazilian maximum corporate tax of 34% on taxable income (25% income tax plus 9% social contribution).
The project is expected to benefit from RECAP (IN SRF 605/2006 – a special tax regime for fixed assets acquisition for exporting companies) which grants PIS (Social Integration Program) and COFINS (Social Security Contribution) exemptions on federal sales taxes charged on gross revenues. The economic analysis assumes that the project is granted this exemption.
The project is expected to be exempt from all importation taxes for products for which there is no similar item produced in Brazil (Ex-Tarifário). Assembled equipment where some but not all individual components are produced in Brazil can be considered exempt from import taxes under these terms. The Project royalties include:
· | A 2.0% CFEM royalty on gross spodumene revenue, paid to the Brazilian Government. The CFEM royalty amount is split between: the Federal Government Entities (10%), State Government of Minas Gerais (15%), and Municipal Government of Araçuaí (60%), for the Federal District and Municipalities, when affected by mining activity and production does not occur in their territories (15%) |
· | Two 1% NSR royalties |
A sensitivity analysis was carried out with the base case (including closure costs) as described above as the midpoint. An interval of ±20% versus base case values was considered using 10% increments. Results are shown in
Figure 0-2 to Figure 0-3 for commodity price, exchange rate, initial CAPEX, OPEX, discount rate, and lithium grade. A further sensitivity analysis was conducted on a case excluding closure costs.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 52 |
The Project’s NPV (and IRR) are not significantly vulnerable to changes in the pre-production initial capital expenditure nor discount rate considered, as shown by the smoother curves associated with these variables. Note that the Project IRR is independent of the discount rate considered.
The Project’s NPV (and IRR) are most sensitive to variation in CIF spodumene price, lithium grade and BRL per US$ exchange rate as shown by the steeper curves associated with these variables. The Project’s NPV is significantly positive at the lower limit of the price interval and the examined exchange rate interval. The NPV is also significantly positive at the upper limit of the operating expenses interval.
Figure 0-2 – Pre-tax NPV (US$ million) First Mine
Figure 0-3 – After-tax NPV (US$ million) First Mine
Production Phase 2
GE21, based on the Mineral Resource, prepared the PEA for the Second Mine.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 53 |
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
It is noted that the Company has not yet made a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. The Company expects that it will assess the results of a pre-feasibility study and a definitive feasibility study before making a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. All statements regarding mine development or production in respect of the Second Mine in this AIF are expressly qualified by this statement.
The Production Phase 2 base case scenario results are presented in Table 0-15.
Table 0-15 – Base Case Economic Analysis Results Second Mine
Item | Unit | Value | ||||
Pre-tax NPV @ 8% | US$ M | 449 | ||||
After-tax IRR | % | 208 | ||||
After-tax payback period | Years | 0.4 |
The main economic assumptions/input parameters used for the Production Phase 2 base case are shown in Table 0-16.
Table 0-16 – Main Macroeconomic Assumptions Second Mine
Item | Unit | Value | ||||
Spodumene price @ 6.00% Li2O (CIF China) (Note 1) | US$/t | 750 | ||||
Spodumene price @ 6.00% Li2O (FOB Ilhéus Port) (Note 2) | US$/t | 646 | ||||
Exchange rate | BRL/US$ | 5.20 | ||||
Discount rate | % | 8.0 |
Note 1: Roskill forecast of average nominal arms-length selling price
Note 2: China spodumene price minus budgetary estimate shipping cost.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 54 |
The main technical assumptions for the Production Phase 2 base case are shown in Table 0-17.
Table 0-17 – Technical Assumptions (base case) Second Mine
Item | Unit | Value | ||||
Total Quantity Milled (LOM) | Mt | 21.3 | ||||
Annual ROM feed processed | Mt | 1.68 | ||||
Annual Spodumene Concentrate Production | t | 220,000 | ||||
Lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) production (Note 1) | t | 33,000 | ||||
Strip ratio | ratio | 11.6:1 | ||||
Average Li2O grade of the Mineral Resource | % | 1.44 | ||||
Spodumene recovery rate | % | 66 | ||||
Concentrate grade | % Li2O | 6.00 | ||||
Mine life | years | 12.7 | ||||
Cost of spodumene concentrate ex-works | US$/t | 256 | ||||
Transportation costs (CIF China) | US$/t | 104 | ||||
Total cash cost (CIF China) | US$/t | 360 | ||||
Processing costs per tonne ROM | US$/t | 8.6 | ||||
Mining costs per waste + mineralized material mined | US$/t mined | 2.3 |
Note 1: Tonnage based on direct conversion to LCE excluding conversion rate
Note 2: Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
In the analysis, a 10-year average Roskill forecast of an average nominal arms-length selling price of US$750.00 (CIF Shanghai) for the spodumene concentrate has been assumed.
The Second Mine project is subject to the same royalties as Production Phase 1.
Table 0-18 analyses the impact on NPV when spodumene pricing and recovery percentages fluctuate.
The Project NPV is most sensitive to movements in the price of spodumene, metallurgical recovery rate of the lithium at the Second Plant. Foreign exchange fluctuations impact operating cash costs (mostly derived from Brazilian Real) and development capital (approximately 70% derived from Brazilian Real prices).
Table 0-18: Sensitivity Analysis on NPV with Different Recovery and Pricing Second Mine
After-Tax | |||||||||
Sensitivity Matrix | NPV (US$ M) | ||||||||
Spodumene Price (CIF China) | Recovery (%) | ||||||||
(US$/t) | 60.4% | 66.0% | |||||||
$ 650 | $ | 260 M | $ | 320 M | |||||
700 | 319 | 384 | |||||||
750 | 378 | 449 | |||||||
800 | 437 | 513 | |||||||
850 | 496 | 578 |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 55 |
Interpretation and Conclusions
Mineral Resources are reported for four pegmatite bodies, Xuxa, Barreiro, Murial and Lavra do Meio. Mineral Reserves are reported for the First Mine.
A PEA which is the subject of the Updated Feasibility Study Report, has been conducted on the Second Mine.
The extraction plan in the PEA assumes development of one open pit and construction of a process plant to process 1,680,000 dry tonnes of feed per year for a mine life of 12 years and eight months.
Under the assumptions presented in the PEA, the mine and process plans are feasible, and the project shows positive economics.
It is noted that the Company has not yet made a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. The Company expects that it will assess the results of a pre-feasibility study and a definitive feasibility study before making a production decision in respect of the Second Mine. All statements regarding mine development or production in respect of the Second Mine in this AIF are expressly qualified by this statement.
Risk Assessment
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
Risk assessment sessions were conducted individually and collectively by all parties. These are summarized in the sections below.
Most aspects of the Project are well defined. The key residual risks are summarized below. One of the most significant risks identified for the Project are related to lithium markets.
The following risks are highlighted for the project:
Lithium market sale price and demand (commercial trends)
Fluctuations in the exchange rate and inflation
Delay in obtaining financing: impact to NTP
Delay in obtaining the license for the Second Mine
More fines generated from mining and crushing: potential negative impact on recovery
Ongoing geotechnical monitoring system can change some final pit slope parameters: potential increase in strip ratio.
Further details on the risk assessment are provided in Section 25.2 of the Updated Feasibility Study Report.
Opportunities
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
The following opportunities are identified for the Second Mine:
· | Recovery of Li2O from hypofines with a flotation circuit | |
· | Potential upgrading of some or all of the Inferred Mineral Resources to higher-confidence categories and eventually conversion to Mineral Reserves. |
· | Recovery of Li2O from petalite |
· | Potential for future underground mining of the First Mine and Second Mine pegmatites if a trade-off study supports the concept |
· | Exchange rate may work in the Project’s favour. |
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 56 |
Recommendations
The following summarizes the recommendations from the First Mine feasibility study and Second Mine PEA in the Updated Feasibility Study Report. A phased work program is planned, which consists of continued exploration over the known pegmatites in the Grota do Cirilo area, together with the implementation of the recommendations of First Mine feasibility study and the Second Mine PEA recommendations.
It is important to note that the recommendations for the different projects can be conducted concurrently.
Geology and Resources
The FS Qualified Persons recommend that additional exploration drilling be conducted across the property to update existing resources and potentially discover new resources. The overall cost for the drill program is estimated at US$6.1M and consists of a 36,000 m drill program to test the Xuxa, Barreiro, Nezinho do Chicao, Murial and Bee areas.
First Mine Recommendations
The recommendations for the First Mine will be implemented in the project execution phase, prior to commencement of operations, and are estimated to be a total of US$1,275,000, consisting of:
· | Process plant (testing for wet magnetic separation equipment, a middlings recrushing recovery trade-off study): US$60,000 |
· | Mine design (finalize topographic survey; complete density, moisture and blasted swell effect analyses for ore and waste; implement a reconciliation system and grade control program; evaluate underground mining potential for below the open pit levels of the mine, conduct a reserve study for underground mining; implement geotechnical monitoring system): US$345,000 |
· | Geotechnical (supplementary geotechnical and hydrogeological investigations of planned infrastructure sites including at waste pile areas; supplementary geochemical tests (ARD); large-scale waste rock and tailings co-disposal stockpile field test): US$870,000. (Note: further details of the proposed geotechnical, hydrogeological and geochemical program are provided in Section 26.3 of the Updated Feasibility Study Report) |
Second Mine Project Recommendations
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
Based on the results of the Second Mine PEA, the FS Qualified Persons recommend that the Company proceed to completing a pre-feasibility study (PFS), and thereafter (based on the results of the PFS) conduct a definitive feasibility study (FS) in respect of the Second Mine.
The 24 m wide accesses significantly affect the overall slope angle of the final pit. If the same access width is maintained in the details of the study, it is recommended to estimate the impact of the ramps in the overall slope angle, so that this value is used in the optimization process. Thus the optimization result will be more adherent with the designed operational pit.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 57 |
Due to the depth of the pit it is necessary to remove a large amount of waste to maintain the 24 m access roads in the final pit. This impact is even more relevant in the annual pits in which it is sought to minimize the stripping ratio in the first years for a better cash flow. It is recommended to evaluate the feasibility of working only with road trucks, thus maintaining all access roads 10 or 12 m wide.
If it is not feasible to operate only with road trucks (due to large amounts of mineralized material/waste), it is recommended to evaluate the use of off-road trucks only in the pre stripping operation. The pre-stripping mining fronts are usually separated from the mining fronts, so that temporary 24-metre accesses would be created only in these regions. In addition, it is possible that the details of the mining plan indicate the option of a new pre stripping around year 9.
In detailing the sequential mining plan it is important to assess the amount of mineralization released by the end of each period because it is often necessary to make a large pushback of waste to access the mineralization. Therefore. it is necessary to plan so that there is no shortage of mineralized fronts released during the period in question.
It is also recommended to implement the hydrological and hydrogeological studies for the next phases of the Project.
Competitive Conditions and Anticipated Trends
Lithium Industry Trends and Demand Outlook
Lithium’s application within end-use sectors has traditionally been restricted to technical markets (ceramics, greases etc), where demand growth is typically aligned to GDP. Since 2010, however, lithium’s demand growth narrative has dramatically shifted toward rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. This is largely owing to structural changes in the automotive sector as manufacturers transition toward EVs. Unlike technical sectors, demand from batteries will be influenced by a combination of macroeconomics, EV policy targets, emissions mandates, and alignment with international treaties on climate change. Lithium-based batteries are expected to be key in the decarbonization of ground transport, via light and commercial vehicles.
World forecast lithium demand by end-use application, 2019-2031 (kt LCE)
Source: Roskill, August 2021
Strong battery demand growth allows for an increasing diversification of battery cathode chemistries requiring different lithium compounds. Use of, and substitution between, compounds is not binary, but rather dictated by the cathode composition, primarily the nickel content. Both carbonate and hydroxide demand are expected to be strong, though Roskill expects demand for hydroxide to increase at a faster rate than carbonate over the outlook period (17% vs 26% CAGR between 2021-2031, respectively) owing to an increasing uptake of high nickel chemistries forecast post-2025.
2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM | 58 |